Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:06:54 +0100
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc:     Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: of: Use correct fwnode for DT-probed chips
Message-ID: <20221116160654.3dofnzvouwfzt3sw@SoMainline.org>
References: <20221111113732.461881-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
 <Y3Kv7XoBytwwy9pC@x1>
 <20221115111800.t6i6fuszhuasvgka@SoMainline.org>
 <Y3S62i7OzocP5QrT@orome>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y3S62i7OzocP5QrT@orome>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-11-16 11:26:34, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:18:00PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-11-14 16:15:25, Brian Masney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 12:37:32PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The OF node store in chip->fwnode is used to explicitly override the FW
> > > > node for a GPIO chip. For chips that use the default FW node (i.e. that
> > > > of their parent device), this will be NULL and cause the chip not to be
> > > > fully registered.
> > > > 
> > > > Instead, use the GPIO device's FW node, which is set to either the node
> > > > of the parent device or the explicit override in chip->fwnode.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 8afe82550240 ("gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode")
> > > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> > > Tested-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > I separately sent a similar type of patch to fix the same issue today:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221114202943.2389489-1-bmasney@redhat.com/T/#u
> > 
> > For completeness, your linked patch fixes a synchronous external abort
> > on multiple Qualcomm platforms pointed out in [1].  This patch however
> > does not, are you sure they fix the exact same issue?
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221115110800.35gl3j43lmbxm3jb@SoMainline.org/
> 
> Can you check if the below fixes the MSM issue that you're seeing
> (applied on top of my earlier patch, though with Brian's reverted
> temporarily)?

Yes that solves it too, thanks!

- Marijn