Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp960491rwb; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:56:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7kmlPI0bsOFZXv7rWIRlHkOBJq55d2Uhv6FUc3j6O1CjPIw8OJZZSjmt82Q7cExomypdNN X-Received: by 2002:a63:fd42:0:b0:426:9c23:97da with SMTP id m2-20020a63fd42000000b004269c2397damr22312600pgj.2.1668621373209; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:56:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668621373; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jLWmk+AZlmfZ/TqwXKniTxPazRBTJvON53+Cug+WPjsa2sutwcdwJbLTohbnvxIhDg ZpuveHBRDN7kdO1fmXXbMuoObKNDKrBhdWmhmofPUhkyjb6JEC9JPm8mnY7GPhQRaDXT wPUunsKXMd3QiTpRjxuw7jcy6wSCzxK5PEJnqNQB8Yu4Cp0ARdX1s2ibW/ZGOV4xXsgY pf0/fnU/sp7tGVZGy5EaopvfvvFcauXmx4+c2TXCrRdsy3IKyY4i8XYS0P/gkkFLSibm jU0uMKnkgJRtwSLcY88zHoj3xKTQ4R5vdNjdVArMb6qSFIMkBcfJp8C7zO4VHDUBl7JO Ht7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=uWIBXVs0fkgryl3oxNTCyzyNFIs41B8IahGuJE83Yvg=; b=JZoBBiEmEhtWZUnlZlJfeyfcyfMxKMhY0aE/6q81u1Ad6NLMX+BEBNY0FQGEJsweMn f/a4GEcP0jDL6PdB/JkKrGfgh6A6dFL2a489NRqEHnmEQ0tFaFUpbxoGl1IDRZAN5ocv 7Ecyd9K3x8C7v9QO9EcgVpgDioAjYdonVpOn4PDLfhKreSYsq44LLFNnLpjC+Sfl7buZ hvS0mrunwyblfaQ86sf84up0CDDvVnfokSB4iJFAUgTpCHRdQJOMDtVsO0LW3+D5tdR4 x3Vi1jG0hKuk6XGWm9NoX6gJPfjn5cI7VMIg65wI7DO8Cf4Rp8LUHZ8gJYX+4NAW4zkz Q0Pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a21-20020a17090a8c1500b0020d3424d919si2353754pjo.97.2022.11.16.09.56.00; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:56:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237725AbiKPRTv (ORCPT + 90 others); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:19:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234369AbiKPRTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:19:41 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14431112E for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CF76268AA6; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:19:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:19:35 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: August Wikerfors Cc: Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS_NID for Samsung PM9B1 256G and 512G Message-ID: <20221116171935.GA24524@lst.de> References: <20221116171727.4083-1-git@augustwikerfors.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221116171727.4083-1-git@augustwikerfors.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 06:17:27PM +0100, August Wikerfors wrote: > The Samsung PM9B1 512G SSD found in some Lenovo Yoga 7 14ARB7 laptop units > reports eui as 0001000200030004 when resuming from s2idle, causing the > device to be removed with this error in dmesg: > > nvme nvme0: identifiers changed for nsid 1 What EUI did it report before? Is the identifier stable after multiple resume cycles? Can some of the Samsung folks here reach out to the relevant firmware team to see if they have any clues?