Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:29:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:29:14 -0500 Received: from 12-224-36-149.client.attbi.com ([12.224.36.149]:62470 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:28:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:27:22 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rene Rebe Cc: Jonathan Hudson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q: device(file) permissions for USB Message-ID: <20011206152721.M2710@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <664.3c0fd1b7.a66fa@trespassersw.daria.co.uk> <20011206223050.179cd30e.rene.rebe@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011206223050.179cd30e.rene.rebe@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 (i586) Reply-By: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 18:50:27 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote: > > This is what I do - but IT SUCKS!! Can't the USB stuff simply use devfs so > I can control the permissions of this USB nodes in a very nice / cleaner > way I do with all my other stuff??? (In contrast to use some find -name > | xargs chmod ... or simillar hacks ...) How is using devfs (and devfsd) any different in "hack level" from using /sbin/hotplug? usbdevfs does not require devfs, which enables the majority of Linux users to actually use it. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/