Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
        Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 34/39] PCI/MSI: Reject multi-MSI early
In-Reply-To: <20221116163118.GA1116261@bhelgaas>
References: <20221116163118.GA1116261@bhelgaas>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:22:18 +0100
Message-ID: <8735aing79.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 16 2022 at 10:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * pci_msi_domain_supports - Check for support of a particular feature flag
>> + * @pdev:		The PCI device to operate on
>> + * @feature_mask:	The feature mask to check for (full match)
>> + * @mode:		If ALLOW_LEGACY this grants the feature when there is no irq domain
>> + *			associated to the device. If DENY_LEGACY the lack of an irq domain
>> + *			makes the feature unsupported
>
> Looks like some of these might be wider than 80 columns, which I think
> was the typical width of this file.

I accommodated to the general sentiment that 80 columns is yesterday. My
new cutoff is 100.

Thanks,

        tglx