Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 12:42:56 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.de>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
        Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Richard Biener <RGuenther@suse.com>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/46] gcc-LTO support for the kernel
Message-ID: <Y3YeQMAqCecwrIN1@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20221114114344.18650-1-jirislaby@kernel.org>
 <CAMj1kXEMejnuMx1LJbfJj1+RUmZzZJNSmOVu_tWAbU6RXGqA3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y3XwkFWJhcwApm4I@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2211170847400.3995@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2211170847400.3995@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:50:59AM +0000, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:40:50PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 12:44, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > this is the first call for comments (and kbuild complaints) for this
> > > > support of gcc (full) LTO in the kernel. Most of the patches come from
> > > > Andi. Me and Martin rebased them to new kernels and fixed the to-use
> > > > known issues. Also I updated most of the commit logs and reordered the
> > > > patches to groups of patches with similar intent.
> > > >
> > > > The very first patch comes from Alexander and is pending on some x86
> > > > queue already (I believe). I am attaching it only for completeness.
> > > > Without that, the kernel does not boot (LTO reorders a lot).
> > > >
> > > > In our measurements, the performance differences are negligible.
> > > >
> > > > The kernel is bigger with gcc LTO due to more inlining.
> > > 
> > > OK, so if I understand this correctly:
> > > - the performance is the same
> > > - the resulting image is bigger
> > > - we need a whole lot of ugly hacks to placate the linker.
> > > 
> > > Pardon my cynicism, but this cover letter does not mention any
> > > advantages of LTO, so what is the point of all of this?
> > 
> > Seconded; I really hate all the ugly required for the GCC-LTO
> > 'solution'. There not actually being any benefit just makes it a very
> > simple decision to drop all these patches on the floor.
> 
> I'd say that instead a prerequesite for the series would be to actually
> enforce hidden visibility for everything not part of the kernel module
> API so the compiler can throw away unused functions.  Currently it has
> to keep everything because with a shared object there might be external
> references to everything exported from individual TUs.

I'm not sure what you're on about; only symbols annotated with
EXPORT_SYMBOL*() are accessible from modules (aka DSOs) and those will
have their address taken. You can feely eliminate any unused symbol.

> There was a size benefit mentioned for module-less monolithic kernels
> as likely used in embedded setups, not sure if that's enough motivation
> to properly annotate symbols with visibility - and as far as I understand
> all these 'required' are actually such fixes.

I'm not seeing how littering __visible is useful or desired, doubly so
for that static hack, that's just a crude work around for GCC LTO being
inferior for not being able to read inline asm.