Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:38:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:38:01 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:15565 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:37:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:37:44 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Greg KH cc: Rene Rebe , Jonathan Hudson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q: device(file) permissions for USB In-Reply-To: <20011206152721.M2710@kroah.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote: > > > > This is what I do - but IT SUCKS!! Can't the USB stuff simply use devfs so > > I can control the permissions of this USB nodes in a very nice / cleaner > > way I do with all my other stuff??? (In contrast to use some find -name Because anybody who uses devfs might as well make everything in /dev 666 and do the same with /etc/shadow while we are at it? > > | xargs chmod ... or simillar hacks ...) > > How is using devfs (and devfsd) any different in "hack level" from using > /sbin/hotplug? > > usbdevfs does not require devfs, which enables the majority of Linux > users to actually use it. s/majority of/& sane/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/