Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:52:25 +0000
Message-ID: <8635ahpu1y.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fixes for single-step test
In-Reply-To: <20221117002350.2178351-1-seanjc@google.com>
References: <20221117002350.2178351-1-seanjc@google.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1
 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:23:48 +0000,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Marc,
> 
> I would like to route this through Paolo's tree/queue for 6.2 along with
> a big pile of other selftests updates.  I am hoping to get the selftests
> pile queued sooner than later as there is a lot of active development in
> that area, and don't want to have the selftests be in a broken state.
> I'm going to send Paolo a pull request shortly, I'll Cc you (and others)
> to keep everyone in the loop and give a chance for objections.
> 
> 
> 
> Fix a typo and an imminenent not-technically-a-bug bug in the single-step
> test where executing an atomic sequence in the guest with single-step
> enable will hang the guest due to eret clearing the local exclusive
> monitor.
> 
> 
> Sean Christopherson (2):
>   KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define
>   KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step without relying on ucall()

I'm obviously late to the party, but hey... For the record:

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.