Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 12:10:04 -0800
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
To:     Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, erdemaktas@google.com,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 071/108] KVM: x86: Allow to update cached values in
 kvm_user_return_msrs w/o wrmsr
Message-ID: <20221117201004.GA2751024@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <cover.1667110240.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <238ab2d9a9d2ea71ecacb25203b91abbaf6fbcb4.1667110240.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <8584a9c7-0ec1-db36-bb32-d508a091ea09@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8584a9c7-0ec1-db36-bb32-d508a091ea09@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 03:36:27PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 65541bfebb37..4d4b71c4cdb1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -440,6 +440,15 @@ void kvm_user_return_msr_init_cpu(void)
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_user_return_msr_init_cpu);
> > +static void kvm_user_return_register_notifier(struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs)
> > +{
> > +	if (!msrs->registered) {
> > +		msrs->urn.on_user_return = kvm_on_user_return;
> > +		user_return_notifier_register(&msrs->urn);
> > +		msrs->registered = true;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >   int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned slot, u64 value, u64 mask)
> >   {
> >   	struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
> > @@ -455,15 +464,22 @@ int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned slot, u64 value, u64 mask)
> >   		return 1;
> >   	msrs->values[slot].curr = value;
> > -	if (!msrs->registered) {
> > -		msrs->urn.on_user_return = kvm_on_user_return;
> > -		user_return_notifier_register(&msrs->urn);
> > -		msrs->registered = true;
> > -	}
> > +	kvm_user_return_register_notifier(msrs);
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_user_return_msr);
> > +/* Update the cache, "curr", and register the notifier */
> > +void kvm_user_return_update_cache(unsigned int slot, u64 value)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!msrs->initialized);
> > +	msrs->values[slot].curr = value;
> 
> If the value is the same as the cached one, can it just skip notifier
> registration?

We know tha the the user of the function (in the next patch) passes the
different value, the initial reset value in the return of TDH.VP.ENTER.  So
such check isn't added.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>