Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:14:38 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Daniel.Machon@microchip.com
Cc:     luwei32@huawei.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
        kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, Lars.Povlsen@microchip.com,
        Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in
 sparx5_qos_init()
Message-ID: <Y3aWLiuC+e03awzx@lunn.ch>
References: <20221117145820.2898968-1-luwei32@huawei.com>
 <Y3ZF6gLy7hjW0KAx@DEN-LT-70577>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y3ZF6gLy7hjW0KAx@DEN-LT-70577>
Precedence: bulk

> sparx5_qos_init() will be expanded in later patch series, as new QoS
> features require new initializations - so this is actually somewhat
> intentional.

When do you expect such patches to land?

If it going to be soon, we can keep the code as it is. If it is going
to be a while, the bots are going to keep finding this and what to
remove it.

     Andrew