Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:27:52 -0800
From:   Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, hdegoede@redhat.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        David.Kaplan@amd.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
        antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/pm: Add enumeration check before spec MSRs
 save/restore setup
Message-ID: <20221118182752.7ovqckwwle3azzrc@desk>
References: <cover.1668539735.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
 <c24db75d69df6e66c0465e13676ad3f2837a2ed8.1668539735.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
 <dc39988c-7b44-63b2-9ddf-6fa986fe7c3b@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dc39988c-7b44-63b2-9ddf-6fa986fe7c3b@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:12:32AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>On 11/15/22 11:17, Pawan Gupta wrote:
>> To fix this, add the corresponding X86_FEATURE bit for each MSR.  Avoid
>> trying to manipulate the MSR when the feature bit is clear. This
>> required adding a X86_FEATURE bit for MSRs that do not have one already,
>> but it's a small price to pay.
>>
>> Fixes: 73924ec4d560 ("x86/pm: Save the MSR validity status at context setup")
>> Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>
>Thanks for fixing this up.  The X86_FEATURE approach is a good one.  The
>"poking at random MSRs" always seemed a bit wonky.
>
>Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Thanks.