Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:05:16 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@microchip.com
Cc:     Kumaravel.Thiagarajan@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        jirislaby@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
        macro@orcam.me.uk, jay.dolan@accesio.com, cang1@live.co.uk,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, wander@redhat.com,
        etremblay@distech-controls.com, jk@ozlabs.org,
        biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        phil.edworthy@renesas.com, lukas@wunner.de,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tty-next 2/4] 8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add
 serial8250_pci_setup_port definition in 8250_pcilib.c
Message-ID: <Y3jGfO5wboXe66KB@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20221117050126.2966714-1-kumaravel.thiagarajan@microchip.com>
 <20221117050126.2966714-3-kumaravel.thiagarajan@microchip.com>
 <Y3Xa9fRP3GGygiVj@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <PH7PR11MB59582CE57CE17F20A041157F9B099@PH7PR11MB5958.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <Y3dh4UlWKP2FzTpq@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <PH7PR11MB595845BBDBD65FB114018C339B089@PH7PR11MB5958.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR11MB595845BBDBD65FB114018C339B089@PH7PR11MB5958.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 03:50:02AM +0000, Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 4:14 PM
> > To: Tharunkumar Pasumarthi - I67821 <Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@microchip.com>

...

> > > > Don't you have a dependency issue here?
> > >
> > > Okay, I will explain the need for the changes done in commit description.
> > 
> > What I meant is that the 8250_pci patch should be _prerequisite_ to your
> > stuff and not otherwise.
> 
> Hi Andy,
> So, do you suggest having these changes done as first patch of the patchset prior to patches
> specific for our driver?

Yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko