Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp3740113rwb; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:16:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4IkzVJBYlzowsYDqWChWWDNI3+E1TN/iyg89gyQc7kL83nGhtvh91dApdx98N8yRgMZ8TC X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5787:b0:218:8398:5846 with SMTP id g7-20020a17090a578700b0021883985846mr15217162pji.241.1669007776916; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:16:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669007776; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aD9ouAChVFK073iZPplwkyagqkSlFaPPR5d8/cgU0R68721kkn0aMe2ZbKN7PZj0p+ bys5qH+fR8hYgSDXVtG9ya7JwF9Su3TJnGsq2I98KMlEjAJv7r24Y2Po456+pPAL18xH Vb3iN8oVlYo451BvMUcW42I+m2wluF8IhScs0RLr2mcrJtTJVhxkb9f4i3tNmzaDoTWr dhemf4dr/YKlL49Ej4lStvfXTXbo/J2Cj8FZaUsDAd7KBicvzb22ZFLu8IqIocaUDt/b ExHPfwie/ExgXT7qLxawvTYFaQA2CbSwwy9oaNWHZ75q1tKa9wn2z+jXLcdFKybG2onf cdAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bYLVLiXwclD51eS42wCwVaYnjiXKyfdPU65LSKCZIJ8=; b=wOmp/ap4PVnvtQ8YYrtWITYf5fULhxwRJTKxqAFbvDiIEPPhkCJAcGkiQm7kB+2XOx TfW4JDXEsVQ501rVM29Ov80Hkk0w9sWNwSPsqKJmiWm9auAOIhhYgSaRh2eSJeUM6oyr z/LwTMS33QZtNAmVjLNCCm8FefvbwXIVjKwNnnErBfYSAjyVjgnw0xPFTQxENU93byk+ A0fT5x3Imq0dAUMrlJDrYmo5CkPsjAr4DprSfkx23PeEMjeheJeywZEZNNUJdCOccr/G K1PtZ+9+pb52aaXm9q0DNbaSEnwzhaAmFzylBgtbv3ERpOd7RhKpUeF334MXsdwh156P be2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=YYNntyAB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c3-20020a170902d48300b0017d52dbbcb0si11732582plg.55.2022.11.20.21.16.03; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=YYNntyAB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229762AbiKUFJh (ORCPT + 90 others); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:09:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34042 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229598AbiKUFJe (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:09:34 -0500 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1925C2BB0F; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pyrite.rasen.tech (h175-177-042-159.catv02.itscom.jp [175.177.42.159]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53C3025B; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 06:09:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1669007371; bh=vv1rZHG/fF4H9au2oTKj46t13Jo9FjmsThfxsJJVBT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YYNntyABD1FshzHCGEeRY4rYzXD7jyuscNvi20SEFdpbFo/kG2YQrrBYuo8pyUhWn 1Y8y99hGB9xsOOFpLBYi/iyNPd505Dm8I6yuvJFKE7eU7aPTsWRb2kYrOhdpbVkHqD viDX8BRMuIBqnDBUxb9h7plytGciuWjiXIBlsx14= Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:09:20 +0900 From: Paul Elder To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Dafna Hirschfeld , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Heiko Stuebner , Helen Koike , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] dt-bindings: media: rkisp1: Add i.MX8MP ISP example Message-ID: References: <20221118093931.1284465-1-paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> <20221118093931.1284465-3-paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> <238f7bf8-578c-5bb4-9f00-50f36334c5cf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <238f7bf8-578c-5bb4-9f00-50f36334c5cf@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:36:31AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/11/2022 07:55, Paul Elder wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:06:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 18/11/2022 10:39, Paul Elder wrote: > >>> From: Laurent Pinchart > >>> > >>> Add an example to the rockchip-isp1 DT binding that showcases usage of > >>> the parallel input of the ISP, connected to the CSI-2 receiver internal > >>> to the i.MX8MP. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > >> > >> Missing SoB. > > > > I don't quite understand. I see an SoB right there. > > Laurent did not sent it. Did you run checkpatch before sending? That's why he's on the "From:" in the beginning. checkpatch says it's fine. > > > > >> > >>> --- > >>> .../bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) > >>> > >> > >> I don't know what do you demonstrate there... usage of endpoints? That's > >> the only difference. Such usage is the same everywhere, nothing specific > > > > I guess...? Doesn't the same argument apply against the px30 example too > > then? > > > >> to this example. You already have two examples, so I don't think this > >> brings anything more. > > > > We do have usage of this in imx8mp.dtsi and overlays for the ISP, but > > those patches haven't been sent/merged yet, so in the meantime I think > > there is value in providing an example here for the imx8mp. > > The examples are not for demonstrating imx8mp or any other soc, but this > one given binding. Changing compatibles and few properties is not a > different example - from "exampleness" point of view it is very similar. Ah okay, I see. Paul