Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:24:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:24:24 -0500 Received: from h201.s254.netsol.com ([216.168.254.201]:39625 "EHLO tesla.admin.cto.netsol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:24:15 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:54:41 -0500 From: Pete Toscano To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: 2.2.18pre21 and ipv6 problems/questions Message-ID: <20001118155441.T11099@tesla.admin.cto.netsol.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kernel Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Uptime: 3:37pm up 12 days, 3:13, 8 users, load average: 0.20, 0.14, 0.10 X-Married: 370 days, 19 hours, 52 minutes, and 33 seconds Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello, i'm trying to set up an ipv6 machine. i got a setup script from freenet6 complete with an ipv6 address and the ipv6 and ipv4 addresses of my tunnel endpoint. i'm seeing some strange behavior, so i have a few questions. most of these are probably ubd (user brain damage), but i'd like to have these verified if possibe =3D). 0. basically, how complete/correct is the ipv6 implementation on 2.2.18pre21? should i even bother or is it fairly stable and correct? 1. how come i can ping6 ::1 just fine as long as the sit0 device is down, but as soon as it comes up, i can't? 2. i understand that the sit devices are pseudo devices on top of (well, in my case) eth0. afaict, sit0 represents my side of an ipv6-in-ipv4 tunnel and sit1 is the other side of it. ipv6 packets destined for removte ipv6 networks should be routed to the like-scoped ipv6 address of the sit1 device, right? 3. aliased interfaces are in ipv4-only construct right? i shouldn't be able to create an alias interface with only an ipv6 address, da? 4. should i be able to delete an address i add to an interface? when i "ifconfig add" an ipv6 address to an interface and then try to "ifconfig del" it, i get "SIOCDIFADDR: Invalid argument". i've tried to del with and without the /prefixlen and neither has worked. thanks, pete --=20 Pete Toscano p:sigsegv@psinet.com w:pete@research.netsol.com GPG fingerprint: D8F5 A087 9A4C 56BB 8F78 B29C 1FF0 1BA7 9008 2736 --V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6FuyRH/Abp5AIJzYRAkgRAJ9VK3KX9RMoORgLn4oLQj8OaNsc4gCgtOBM QMTBAfMpfz6urHw6AXTvfdI= =niWb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V7BlxAaPrdhzdIM1-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/