Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:42:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:42:37 -0500 Received: from cpe-66-1-134-68.ca.sprintbbd.net ([66.1.134.68]:14790 "HELO core.sitedirection.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: <054401c17ed2$3b03a0d0$0f00a8c0@minniemouse> From: "Jon" To: Subject: TCP performance eepro100 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:49:53 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Has anyone done testing on eepro100 and seen really poor performance? I am seeing that the eepro100 in SuSE 2.4.7 and above is 50% slower than than 2.4.2 in RH 7.1 I am doing a simple test with ttcp against another RH server and then SuSE vs SuSE or vs the RH system. In all cases the eepro100at best shows 39mbs. In modules.conf I am setting options="0x30" that forces 100mbps Full Duplex, this is also reflected in dmesg. With the new intel e100 it is possible to get 60mbps on SuSE. Is there something in the Kernel build or Driver build that is multi-casting or filtering that may cause this? Any ideas at this point would help. BTW, I am using SMP Kernels on all the systems. Regards, Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/