Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp4590561rwb; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:21:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7pF0KwDvuPK6ZHpyjZHoyxxtVKhzY49rPSIbhyjp/HQyOFwBjnShYCCl86AxmQTGxk6pAQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:d66:b0:56a:fd45:d054 with SMTP id n38-20020a056a000d6600b0056afd45d054mr5726583pfv.3.1669051296473; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:21:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669051296; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vs7z9UD7UraVv5jPLonotnm87Ed50El9NHPDrWzcKxzH44wLtbDmAZMo7W5Yiz+Xp2 oRpjM6qXZMlSZe46onm29ciQj7ROPQzNsF8ob+qbjS59764HFZJSeLHuWOLLPFxoV3oB JzAMgehVUMQLNS2Kr+2x8nDcon3twJH36YpUo4nradYdzL2uOBLJ4Po2Y2lHieGkR840 /wxt4CKviCLSGgz6Cm0HNClshAC1jcPS+4eo3Bd5LKkzduGwdqqr/OYe/NwLPjz0XIf7 Mn72MQsd026DPjPFLECmJOZ1zuRVt1/3/EWSDshrtKSE1vhMLEv94TzqqHEyB2ThtD69 5kJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=dwCHqKtNWwOZkhmH0ZzjrvRXVmU5GqeQoEQZzyxt9n8=; b=CjD+H9s3kNHdBhpF7s3abJLo810hkTEY+Z60WmvwgT6rRy/34zpzn9KAyIjtwMqJiR ee3XpZWjj4/5PHdGG0o3dhbyXt6dp6QExgO100O90Zl/CFaddaLvM82n3Mu6LMuOe1vJ +mUDamh+FhuHzAbECenxqn41MPbnRQVq9aV1GWjF9Vvow98MiIzS4brGcC22sa1/P4Fw eLL+J33verji1iGx1TeD5dplR9YCftOjrTjSa8TM8axAcQC/LnmB03Wy/sBTNO1j0C7R OTsQEJBRzxJfd7Mp0g2cK7oPR6f7RP0YcvWKrCCOJmJpR6mXy2oJodaveHTnAJjn8pzE Akpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mzbdeZV8; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1-20020a17090a5b0100b0020fadac08a2si10157462pji.108.2022.11.21.09.21.22; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mzbdeZV8; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231205AbiKURMj (ORCPT + 91 others); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:12:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230411AbiKURMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:12:17 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84734CEFFE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DD21F8B5; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669050731; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dwCHqKtNWwOZkhmH0ZzjrvRXVmU5GqeQoEQZzyxt9n8=; b=mzbdeZV88nwMJZERHp+MxXlxhLuB+ykt8joysBTSggmyh+1h/eKA6pjRb67jY7IJfiK3++ TUSJ8ThVLF9cR87APpWHkMjZXkxns2qobBRdsatFT6Z8+B78H8pg+1e8yL7zdJriIJACeW SAQXkURnU8HJ5xEpv5MTvds2GD3FRgk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669050731; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dwCHqKtNWwOZkhmH0ZzjrvRXVmU5GqeQoEQZzyxt9n8=; b=/Q1Dwl+GqymCzCwHjoL2MulHeNdgBKkXPw8jB4vzjZJWHTg7KKAC5SiHCtQa6lL5fIh770 lcxE/2aEcQszx0Bw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789241377F; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 2OHiHGuxe2MQeQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:12:11 +0000 From: Vlastimil Babka To: Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Pekka Enberg Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Roman Gushchin , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox , patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka Subject: [PATCH 06/12] mm, slub: don't create kmalloc-rcl caches with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:11:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20221121171202.22080-7-vbabka@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221121171202.22080-1-vbabka@suse.cz> References: <20221121171202.22080-1-vbabka@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Distinguishing kmalloc(__GFP_RECLAIMABLE) can help against fragmentation by grouping pages by mobility, but on tiny systems the extra memory overhead of separate set of kmalloc-rcl caches will probably be worse, and mobility grouping likely disabled anyway. Thus with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY, don't create kmalloc-rcl caches and use the regular ones. Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka --- include/linux/slab.h | 4 ++++ mm/slab_common.c | 10 ++++++++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h index 45efc6c553b8..3ce9474c90ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/slab.h +++ b/include/linux/slab.h @@ -339,7 +339,11 @@ enum kmalloc_cache_type { #else KMALLOC_CGROUP, #endif +#ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY KMALLOC_RECLAIM, +#else + KMALLOC_RECLAIM = KMALLOC_NORMAL, +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA KMALLOC_DMA, #endif diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index a8cb5de255fc..907d52963806 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -770,10 +770,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_size_roundup); #define KMALLOC_CGROUP_NAME(sz) #endif +#ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY +#define KMALLOC_RCL_NAME(sz) .name[KMALLOC_RECLAIM] = "kmalloc-rcl-" #sz, +#else +#define KMALLOC_RCL_NAME(sz) +#endif + #define INIT_KMALLOC_INFO(__size, __short_size) \ { \ .name[KMALLOC_NORMAL] = "kmalloc-" #__short_size, \ - .name[KMALLOC_RECLAIM] = "kmalloc-rcl-" #__short_size, \ + KMALLOC_RCL_NAME(__short_size) \ KMALLOC_CGROUP_NAME(__short_size) \ KMALLOC_DMA_NAME(__short_size) \ .size = __size, \ @@ -859,7 +865,7 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void) static void __init new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, enum kmalloc_cache_type type, slab_flags_t flags) { - if (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM) { + if ((KMALLOC_RECLAIM != KMALLOC_NORMAL) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) { flags |= SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT; } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && (type == KMALLOC_CGROUP)) { if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled()) { -- 2.38.1