Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:43:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:43:38 -0500 Received: from zok.sgi.com ([204.94.215.101]:53405 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:43:19 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Luca Montecchiani , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 01:12:53 BST." <200112070012.BAA24810@webserver.ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:43:06 +1100 Message-ID: <23818.1007696586@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 01:12:53 +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: >BTW, for the further ongoing of this patch, I ran into the question if > >MODULE_PARM(type, "1-(16)i"); > >would be a valid statement. I guess not. But if not, could some kind >soul please explain to me how to get rid of the braces "(" ")" given >in definitions from CONFIG stuff. > >E.g.: > >CONFIG_ME_BEING_DUMB (16) Don't do that. CONFIG numbers are expected to be plain numbers, not expressions, e.g. CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=16, not (16). Given the fragility of CML1 I would not be surprised if (16) broke some of the shell scripts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/