Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <11f65f51-5d77-e1cc-8f8a-779e35dd6af3@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:50:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] module: Merge same-name module load requests
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, pmladek@suse.com,
        linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <aa8d9456-b260-d999-0296-8e6ab876af7a@suse.com>
 <Y07xX2ejlg0oFoEy@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <d0bc50e3-0e42-311b-20ed-7538bb918c5b@suse.com>
 <Y277Jb9i2VeXQoTL@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <e070839f-c224-047b-9411-91143c1d8394@redhat.com>
 <Y3Jg8X7qv2AKPU1J@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <5467e66d-55de-ca8f-c1ae-ffe6efe7290d@redhat.com>
 <Y3Pol5H4kJioAV9W@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <c2e841b7-e2b3-09f9-8187-328131d72c5d@redhat.com>
 <049a8f8a-baf8-744d-6250-575fc0dc533e@suse.com>
 <Y3vLbDAeILx7gJPT@bombadil.infradead.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
In-Reply-To: <Y3vLbDAeILx7gJPT@bombadil.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 21.11.22 20:03, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:00:49PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> On 11/16/22 17:03, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On 11/15/22 14:29, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:45:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Note that I don't think the issue I raised is due to 6e6de3dee51a.
>>>>> I don't have the machine at hand right now. But, again, I doubt this will
>>>>> fix it.
>>>>
>>>> There are *more* modules processed after that commit. That's all. So
>>>> testing would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell us if
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20221102195957.82871-1-stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> resolves the module loading delay problem?
>>
>> This patch unfortunately makes no difference on my test system. In my case,
>> the kernel has already intel_pstate loaded when udev starts inserting a burst
>> of acpi_cpufreq modules. It then causes the init function acpi_cpufreq_init()
>> to immediately return once the check cpufreq_get_current_driver() fails. The
>> code modified by the patch is not reached at all.
> 
> To be clear I don't care about the patch mentioned in the above URL, I care
> about this:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d0bc50e3-0e42-311b-20ed-7538bb918c5b@suse.com
> 
> David was this the on you tested too?

Yes, that's the one I tried without luck.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb