Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <25981cc9-243e-bece-4e85-86f3c880d96f@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:41:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Cc:     baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.2
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
References: <20221122002949.148140-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <Y3yRMXGPcYbXH9uL@8bytes.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y3yRMXGPcYbXH9uL@8bytes.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Joerg,

On 2022/11/22 17:06, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Baolu,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:29:42AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Lu Baolu (7):
>>    iommu/vt-d: Allocate pasid table in device probe path
>>    iommu/vt-d: Add device_block_translation() helper
>>    iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support
>>    iommu/vt-d: Rename iommu_disable_dev_iotlb()
>>    iommu/vt-d: Rename domain_add_dev_info()
>>    iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary domain_context_mapped()
>>    iommu/vt-d: Use real field for indication of first level
> 
> Applied the first 6 patches. The last one has conflicts and doesn't
> apply on top of my x86/vt-d branch. Could you please have a look please?

I guess the last patch conflicts with below commit:

242b0aaeabbe ("iommu/vt-d: Preset Access bit for IOVA in FL non-leaf 
paging entries")

which was merged in v6.1-rc6. Can you please bring the x86/vt-d branch
to v6.1-rc6, or do you want me to rebase that patch on the existing top
of the branch?

Best regards,
baolu