Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:06:57 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.2
Message-ID: <Y3yRMXGPcYbXH9uL@8bytes.org>
References: <20221122002949.148140-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221122002949.148140-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Baolu,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:29:42AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Lu Baolu (7):
>   iommu/vt-d: Allocate pasid table in device probe path
>   iommu/vt-d: Add device_block_translation() helper
>   iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support
>   iommu/vt-d: Rename iommu_disable_dev_iotlb()
>   iommu/vt-d: Rename domain_add_dev_info()
>   iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary domain_context_mapped()
>   iommu/vt-d: Use real field for indication of first level

Applied the first 6 patches. The last one has conflicts and doesn't
apply on top of my x86/vt-d branch. Could you please have a look please?

Thanks,

	Joerg