Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp5627503rwb; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:41:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4jmksEK1LP/glLiohCv7jRdiAmCFkPH5kYjHKG474VldFPxSAFcOG4njGt5CoF8Iq83yc5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e009:b0:186:f934:30af with SMTP id o9-20020a170902e00900b00186f93430afmr3898828plo.126.1669113695599; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:41:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669113695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ARfIuj0rtx43h2JChuOpIbLZy3JHejzn6FuJAD60bXbdPzLWhlFM+xVuX3wBJKx86C KhqXvwfaGPRQmb8O6VAtXLTvG97bM4qaexyUD/U6fm7mF0WIy7VV/q2GnSGP2umImRhe N8b2qOSgcI8Z2O/LrnhI5e3tWsT81xZCRJZUo2so19DtPxT8ZeFgqptRFzl4R+4YDPz9 Dgl+cKVAYMQ8cNoRKkvQ/doAsrpcYIZryatTKjbmhai8A6X2NAoZQrcJJ85oqsw2+2Ua jqER2S32XhHWiYtK8WRMXlNv5+FyYNXMbOa9ckjekgbJd71arh2c4VrbqF0Znqz3926/ wEIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=waIgJpgjNqSFfMmI93mxxF++m/jo6IpqkSlWNClHgSI=; b=FkSMNdPgRZSOMl6GEGC12B8xJc7y/crf6MWdAy21OMFbfXzFwptwroOuFC8bnm/BmM rCKOrQf2+hF2yyuON8EQ9YtLF4PeHT73BDfDH0m13yFBBoHzaR6erXuN+rujYr2IKT3m 96VuRnNnwZCCve8ACODRM1yv7GT8NUgUQIvm9KgevZCQGXScktmUN1yAoNKBDa+lHOpT XR/SKbfguqwPpL6xMMmpvQfz5Eju61VwcOUMU97cp7Cosqq8btM8KDtqOFXMiQ+vvF0I 1ZKaUoRyaQOo5v5EJTBbo1PniUPL80ygZZCMxnH4ecoBpGKQehJgJ141fH4JdaiBAFAf ETIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=J5AwhQNs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nn18-20020a17090b38d200b002131bb4043asi19227027pjb.177.2022.11.22.02.41.23; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=J5AwhQNs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232611AbiKVJeS (ORCPT + 91 others); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 04:34:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231923AbiKVJeP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 04:34:15 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92C6644C; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 2AM8d916028851; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=waIgJpgjNqSFfMmI93mxxF++m/jo6IpqkSlWNClHgSI=; b=J5AwhQNsQb2eid9FLXbarvCI7GIrmGZVFvU1tm6IHAGMYdHTIxBRjLH7SrfyWf2lvBi4 V/N4Wula+o25rreYd+AKYmaBzKVBHcTT7UnaQK7S20DG6IA2IwoR83n9t65zhIkaez7n BHe9QKynsxh9NTZI/3TKA1QTfVIJzHVOvM7URNkfic+TL2j0VgH1uxU1+OAVi+Yw/nQ+ XDnG00DZM6avfhCoDSqVjSpr9qm0YEQdP9MgqoaX4Kd7DTq1ubmDQ5AZjQ0QolhWQBPP Oe20NfXNWCbIFK8nVX8h+Mc6quao+WF7dlW54WMP0eYHdRJj0oTgkQ3P/BfOe+FTqhMf rA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3m0rhdcwem-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:09 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2AM7mVF9009259; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:09 GMT Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3m0rhdcwdt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2AM9LU7R031077; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:07 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3kxps92vuj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:06 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2AM9Y3tq6423140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:03 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE30A4059; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97D3A4051; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-7e0de7cc-2d9d-11b2-a85c-de26c016e5ad.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.44.213]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:02 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <71d10db8151c3b78d84a252a688e2892448eaa95.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch To: Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev Cc: David Hildenbrand , Jonathan Corbet , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , Sven Schnelle Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:34:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20221117221758.66326-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> <20221117221758.66326-6-scgl@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-2.fc35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TE8dwqfOiCUvqpW2CEZMTngHlClnv3fj X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZUply-oT0HlAwhb8_mCmPxmc8BeHrB4S X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-11-22_04,2022-11-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2210170000 definitions=main-2211220070 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 08:52 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17/11/2022 23.17, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: > > This allows checking if the necessary requirements for a test case are > > met via an arbitrary expression. In particular, it is easy to check if > > certain bits are set in the memop extension capability. > > > > Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 132 +++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > > index 286185a59238..10f34c629cac 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > > @@ -690,87 +690,87 @@ static void test_errors(void) > > kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm); > > } > > [...] > > > > + } testlist[] = { > > + { > > + .name = "simple copy", > > + .test = test_copy, > > + .requirements_met = true, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "generic error checks", > > + .test = test_errors, > > + .requirements_met = true, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "copy with storage keys", > > + .test = test_copy_key, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "copy with key storage protection override", > > + .test = test_copy_key_storage_prot_override, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "copy with key fetch protection", > > + .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "copy with key fetch protection override", > > + .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "error checks with key", > > + .test = test_errors_key, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "termination", > > + .test = test_termination, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "error checks with key storage protection override", > > + .test = test_errors_key_storage_prot_override, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "error checks without key fetch prot override", > > + .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > + }, > > + { > > + .name = "error checks with key fetch prot override", > > + .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled, > > + .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0, > > I wonder whether it would rather make sense to check for "extension_cap & 1" > instead of "extension_cap > 0" ? The cap should always have been a bitmap, but unfortunately I didn't initially define it as one, the storage key extension must be supported if the cap > 0. So the test reflects that and may catch an error in the future. > > Anyway: > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth > Thanks!