Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 04:37:08 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] init: move block device helpers from
 init/do_mounts.c
Message-ID: <Y3zCdJr5dKsADsnM@infradead.org>
References: <cover.1668644705.git.daniel@makrotopia.org>
 <e5e0ab0429b1fc8a4e3f9614d2d1cc43dea78093.1668644705.git.daniel@makrotopia.org>
 <Y3XM62P7CaeKXFsz@infradead.org>
 <Y3j+Pzy1JpqG8Yd8@makrotopia.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y3j+Pzy1JpqG8Yd8@makrotopia.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 04:03:11PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> That works, but has slightly less utility value than the partition
> parser approach as in this way I cannot easily populate the PARTNAME
> uevent which can later help userspace to identify a device by the FIT
> subimage name -- I'd have to either invent a new bus_type or
> device_type, both seem inappropriate and have unwanted side effects.
> Or am I missing something and there is a way to use add_uevent_var()
> for a disk_type device?

You're not exposing a partition here - this is an image format that
sits in a partition and we should not pretend that is a partition.

> However, I don't see a way to avoid using (or duplicating)
> devt_from_devname() to select the lower device somehow without having
> to probe and parse *all* block devices present (which is, from what I
> understood, what you want to avoid, and I agree that it is more safe to
> not do that...)
> 
> Can you or anyone give some advise on how this should be done?

Just set the block driver up from an initramfs, like we do for all
modern stackable drivers.

> Yet another (imho not terrible) problem is removal of the lower device.
> Many of the supported SBC use a micro SD card to boot, which can be
> removed by the user while the system is running (which is generally not
> a good idea, but anyway). For partitions this is handled automatically
> by blk_drop_partitions() called directly from genhd.c.
> I'm currently playing with doing something similar using the bus device
> removal notification, but it doesn't seem to work for all cases, e.g.
> mmcblk device do not seem to have the ->bus pointer populated at all
> (ie. disk_to_dev(disk)->bus == NULL for mmcblk devices).

I have WIP patches that allow the claimer of a block device get
resize and removal notification.  It's not going to land for 6.2,
but I hope I have it ready in time for the next merge window.