Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965092AbXHJTnH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:43:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760458AbXHJTmw (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:42:52 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:49917 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757113AbXHJTmv (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:42:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:41:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: Gabriel C , Michal Piotrowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netdev , coreteam@netfilter.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 Message-Id: <20070810124156.2de9710e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070809224254.11f42716.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46BC8F71.3070006@googlemail.com> <46BC944F.9020801@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2164 Lines: 60 On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:33:41 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Gabriel C writes: > > > Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> Andrew Morton pisze: > >>> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2/ > >>> > >> > >> Yet another sysctl table check failed > >> > >> [ 88.949055] Netfilter messages via NETLINK v0.30. > >> [ 89.485399] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max) > >> [ 89.491892] sysctl table check failed: > > /net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_generic_timeout .3.19.13 Missing strategy > >> [ 89.558178] xt_state: Unknown symbol nf_conntrack_untracked > >> [ 89.563942] xt_state: Unknown symbol nf_ct_l3proto_module_put > >> [ 89.569870] xt_state: Unknown symbol nf_ct_l3proto_try_module_get > >> [ 90.852319] NET: Registered protocol family 17 > >> > > > > And maybe this ? > > Could be. > > sysctl table check failure looks legitimate. > At a quick skim I can't tell for certain if failure to register the > sysctl table will keep the module from loading but it might. > > It looks like another canidate on the pile of kill the broken > binary sysctl. > There seems to be rather a lot of damage here. I assume that the sysctl changes are what caused the netfilter oopses. - nf_conntrack_init() calls nf_conntrack_expect_init() which fails due to sysctl problems. - nf_conntrack_init() bales out without calling nf_conntrack_helper_init() So nf_ct_helper_hsize never gets initialised. - Later, netfilter client code calls helper_hash(), which gets a divide-by-zero due to nf_ct_helper_hsize==0. yeah, that's a netfilter bug, but we're trying to get kernels tested here. If I'm feeling energetic I'll drop the sysctl changes and do rc2-mm3. Probably I won't feel energetic, but we'll need a lot of fixes here before I can release the sysctl changes in another -mm, please. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/