Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:34:20 +0100
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] PCI: hotplug: Add checks to avoid doing hotplug
 on PCIe Upstream Ports
Message-ID: <20221122183420.GA22578@wunner.de>
References: <5623410.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
 <20221122180603.GA205176@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221122180603.GA205176@bhelgaas>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:06:03PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:13:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > PCIe Upstream Ports are not hotplug-capable by definition, but it turns out
> > that in some cases, if the system is configured in a particularly interesting
> > way, the kernel may be made attempt to operate an Upstream Port as a hotplug
> > one which causes functional issues to appear.
> > 
> > The following 2 patches amend the code to prevent this behavior from occurring.
> 
> Thanks, applied to pci/hotplug for v6.2.  Lukas, I didn't presume to
> convert your LGTM to Reviewed-by, but would be happy add it.

I figured that having both a Suggested-by and a Reviewed-by might
look odd, hence went with the more neutral LGTM.  But I see it was
ambiguous.  Either way is fine for me. :)

Thanks,

Lukas