Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934257AbXHJWqT (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:46:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754577AbXHJWqB (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:46:01 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55905 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753415AbXHJWqA (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:46:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070810.154601.98709831.davem@davemloft.net> To: greearb@candelatech.com Cc: jeff@garzik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <46BCE942.1030107@candelatech.com> References: <46BCD47C.9060408@candelatech.com> <20070810.151039.31642625.davem@davemloft.net> <46BCE942.1030107@candelatech.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 598 Lines: 15 From: Ben Greear Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:40:02 -0700 > For GSO on output, is there a generic fallback for any driver that > does not specifically implement GSO? Absolutely, in fact that's mainly what it's there for. I don't think there is any issue. The knob is there via ethtool for people who really want to disable it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/