Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:10:58 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_L=E9ger?= <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle
Message-ID: <Y35wQuIbiCxyaOyp@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20221121152704.30180-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221121152704.30180-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...

+ Cc: Petr, Sergey

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> which is a better coding practice.

It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.

Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).

Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko