Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABWYdi0G7cyNFbndM-ELTDAR3x4Ngm0AehEp5aP0tfNkXUE+Uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOUHufYd-5cqLsQvPBwcmWeph2pQyQYFRWynyg0UVpzUBWKbxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOUHufYSeTeO5ZMpnCR781esHV4QV5Th+pd=52UaM9cXNNKF9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y31s/K8T85jh05wH@google.com> <Y36PF972kOK3ADvx@cmpxchg.org>
In-Reply-To: <Y36PF972kOK3ADvx@cmpxchg.org>
From:   Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:18:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOUHufZxguv_m3Td7e5Qt-yKpV7rmWyv_m_UFS9n19K=_=xLcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Low TCP throughput due to vmpressure with swap enabled
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:22 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:44:44PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > Hi Johannes,
> >
> > Do you think it makes sense to have the below for both the baseline and
> > MGLRU or it's some behavior change that the baseline doesn't want to
> > risk?
>
> It looks good to me. Besides the new FMODE_NOREUSE, it's also a nice
> cleanup on the rmap side!
>
> It would just be good to keep the comment from folio_referenced_one() and
> move it to the vma_has_locality() check in invalid_folio_referenced_vma().
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Thanks.

I've added Ivan's test case to my collection. Interestingly, after
this patch, the download speed increased while fio was running (my
guess is that fio pushed more cold anon into swap):

$ uname
Linux test127 6.1.0-rc6-dirty #2 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Nov 23
16:51:20 MST 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ go version
go version go1.18.1 linux/amd64

$ fio -v
fio-3.28

$ curl --version
curl 7.81.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.81.0 OpenSSL/3.0.2
zlib/1.2.11 brotli/1.0.9 zstd/1.4.8 libidn2/2.3.2 libpsl/0.21.0
(+libidn2/2.3.2) libssh/0.9.6/openssl/zlib nghttp2/1.43.0 librtmp/2.3
OpenLDAP/2.5.13
Release-Date: 2022-01-05
Protocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher gophers http https imap imaps
ldap ldaps mqtt pop3 pop3s rtmp rtsp scp sftp smb smbs smtp smtps
telnet tftp
Features: alt-svc AsynchDNS brotli GSS-API HSTS HTTP2 HTTPS-proxy IDN
IPv6 Kerberos Largefile libz NTLM NTLM_WB PSL SPNEGO SSL TLS-SRP
UnixSockets zstd

fio NOT running:

 % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  83.6M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 87.0M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  82.8M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 79.1M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  82.7M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 89.7M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  87.4M      0 --:--:--  0:00:54 --:--:-- 94.3M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  88.1M      0 --:--:--  0:00:54 --:--:-- 94.7M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  82.6M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 83.9M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  86.4M      0 --:--:--  0:00:55 --:--:-- 90.1M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  82.8M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 67.5M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  83.4M      0 --:--:--  0:00:57 --:--:-- 78.7M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  84.0M      0 --:--:--  0:00:56 --:--:-- 87.4M


fio running:

 % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  86.7M      0 --:--:--  0:01:11 --:--:-- 88.7M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  87.7M      0 --:--:--  0:00:54 --:--:-- 93.5M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  88.5M      0 --:--:--  0:00:53 --:--:-- 95.1M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  91.6M      0 --:--:--  0:00:52 --:--:-- 94.4M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  89.4M      0 --:--:--  0:00:53 --:--:-- 86.6M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  88.6M      0 --:--:--  0:00:53 --:--:-- 84.8M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  84.6M      0 --:--:--  0:00:56 --:--:-- 87.5M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  86.9M      0 --:--:--  0:00:54 --:--:-- 81.4M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  89.0M      0 --:--:--  0:00:53 --:--:-- 86.4M
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 4768M    0 4768M    0     0  91.1M      0 --:--:--  0:00:52 --:--:-- 90.6M