Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp8735183rwb; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:42:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5KAAolrkaVlLsvUPqTeDgPG4wZzRV/vbpB8EP76o7dY8KXEoo3xEWnKVTRRvTO4E7y/PsR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:248e:b0:461:e2ab:912d with SMTP id q14-20020a056402248e00b00461e2ab912dmr13413481eda.93.1669290143272; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:42:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669290143; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t4t7kKiAjcOaR6d4iBoCgR815LNk6onMEQlghdBc5y1UjU5jSAlE5QNdWOYN1FSkJL 2en7QTiskcrrOhR5urbb5UP9sXfkKYc3oe2efeo1Aa4njHJ0k/bDAPcvlv87B/opVB2E PuIGh6N1uqzUVbnQoY9r8Ge5YbWIoYutLIfQqt7aOiM6EW0oI3PH7fGuiqP5s4jTRED1 v6Hkrsu7o9tluIhtVBWhGVumxp8+aDzb5+selJE1rV1zze9wjr7xVqHQw4BE7U4Aip/D rilkGCrx6RHOFOCR1byIuWCUdlJT1ocDs6J94GSSTgKNjMZxukw4CDZKdY0XIp4BLQZj 7nfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=RrOpQZ1dCJ44vBqbuzIeV1uVpDPaN1FxpfGRlnuKzoU=; b=DPQZj7zbIiE+smpTLdySee1eT4R760w3tDHkyQV55pVKMrzXMZj54c+h+rNef1ywvg MKi+voUmFAu9pILsy83d0suiTSkHL0qgGWm0byHg7oNSiqtrLF7CWCCHqD+Oho4Qi/91 1kwWUEtVCwG+SC4LHRPMrvfBjvb0YfOqTBe79+UHvPZHAa16AtLtArA49tvPji6wcidC pwuK/UUY8opUh/46s7OFBzV6DRbut1TW7BYQhM71eS1POrWaDWbA9cKoic8KNcSo5f0u v1pQxkBITWsgEKCwL2PYEaxv47lEddcmXNPzalsCZ2mzWxqz+/SpBBuzxbmDWoX5VMdd HPqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eq9-20020a056402298900b00459060fce1bsi717929edb.574.2022.11.24.03.42.02; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:42:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230046AbiKXLUG (ORCPT + 86 others); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:20:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230085AbiKXLT4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:19:56 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121B4120B7; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NHwWP5pt8z689hv; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:19:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) by fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:19:50 +0100 Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:19:50 +0000 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:19:49 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ira Weiny CC: Dan Williams , Bjorn Helgaas , Lukas Wunner , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Gregory Price , "Li, Ming" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] PCI/DOE: Remove the pci_doe_flush_mb() call Message-ID: <20221124111949.00007bd9@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20221122155324.1878416-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20221122155324.1878416-2-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20221122163426.0000467c@Huawei.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:35:37 -0800 Ira Weiny wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:34:26PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:53:23 -0800 > > ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > > > > > From: Ira Weiny > > > > > > Each struct doe_mb is managed as part of the PCI device. They can't go > > > away as long as the PCI device exists. pci_doe_flush_mb() was set up to > > > flush the workqueue and prevent any further submissions to the mailboxes > > > when the PCI device goes away. Unfortunately, this was fundamentally > > > flawed. There was no guarantee that a struct doe_mb remained after > > > pci_doe_flush_mb() returned. Therefore, the doe_mb state could be > > > invalid when those threads waiting on the workqueue were flushed. > > > > > > Fortunately the current code is safe because all callers make a > > > synchronous call to pci_doe_submit_task() and maintain a reference on the > > > PCI device. > > > > > > For these reasons, pci_doe_flush_mb() will never be called while tasks > > > are being processed and there is no use for it. > > > > > > Remove the dead code around pci_doe_flush_mb(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny > > > > Looks fine I think, though one question inline. > > > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/doe.c | 48 ++++------------------------------------------- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c > > > index e402f05068a5..260313e9052e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > > > @@ -24,10 +24,9 @@ > > > > > > /* Timeout of 1 second from 6.30.2 Operation, PCI Spec r6.0 */ > > > #define PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT HZ > > > -#define PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL (PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT / 128) > > > +#define PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL 8 > > > > Why this change? > > msleep_interruptible() takes a millisecond value and wait_event_timeout() takes > jiffies. 1/128 of a second is ~8ms. > > While for most configs (HZ == 1000) the value does not change. I don't believe > this would be true for all configs. Thus a more explicit define. > Makes sense. Maybe add a postfix as well to make it clear it's not in same units as the PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT? PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL_MSECS > I'll add a comment. > > Ira > > > > > > > > > -#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL 0 > > > -#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD 1 > > > +#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD 0 > > > > > > /** > > > * struct pci_doe_mb - State for a single DOE mailbox > > > @@ -53,15 +52,6 @@ struct pci_doe_mb { > > > unsigned long flags; > > > }; > > > > > > -static int pci_doe_wait(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, unsigned long timeout) > > > -{ > > > - if (wait_event_timeout(doe_mb->wq, > > > - test_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL, &doe_mb->flags), > > > - timeout)) > > > - return -EIO; > > > - return 0; > > > -} > > > - > > > static void pci_doe_write_ctrl(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u32 val) > > > { > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = doe_mb->pdev; > > > @@ -82,12 +72,9 @@ static int pci_doe_abort(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) > > > pci_doe_write_ctrl(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_CTRL_ABORT); > > > > > > do { > > > - int rc; > > > u32 val; > > > > > > - rc = pci_doe_wait(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > > > - if (rc) > > > - return rc; > > > + msleep_interruptible(PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > > > pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_STATUS, &val); > > > > > > /* Abort success! */ > > > @@ -278,11 +265,7 @@ static void doe_statemachine_work(struct work_struct *work) > > > signal_task_abort(task, -EIO); > > > return; > > > } > > > - rc = pci_doe_wait(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > > > - if (rc) { > > > - signal_task_abort(task, rc); > > > - return; > > > - } > > > + msleep_interruptible(PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > > > goto retry_resp; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -383,21 +366,6 @@ static void pci_doe_destroy_workqueue(void *mb) > > > destroy_workqueue(doe_mb->work_queue); > > > } > > > > > > -static void pci_doe_flush_mb(void *mb) > > > -{ > > > - struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb = mb; > > > - > > > - /* Stop all pending work items from starting */ > > > - set_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD, &doe_mb->flags); > > > - > > > - /* Cancel an in progress work item, if necessary */ > > > - set_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL, &doe_mb->flags); > > > - wake_up(&doe_mb->wq); > > > - > > > - /* Flush all work items */ > > > - flush_workqueue(doe_mb->work_queue); > > > -} > > > - > > > /** > > > * pcim_doe_create_mb() - Create a DOE mailbox object > > > * > > > @@ -450,14 +418,6 @@ struct pci_doe_mb *pcim_doe_create_mb(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 cap_offset) > > > return ERR_PTR(rc); > > > } > > > > > > - /* > > > - * The state machine and the mailbox should be in sync now; > > > - * Set up mailbox flush prior to using the mailbox to query protocols. > > > - */ > > > - rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, pci_doe_flush_mb, doe_mb); > > > - if (rc) > > > - return ERR_PTR(rc); > > > - > > > rc = pci_doe_cache_protocols(doe_mb); > > > if (rc) { > > > pci_err(pdev, "[%x] failed to cache protocols : %d\n", > > >