Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:55:01 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
CC:     "Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@zenithal.me>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>, Jiatai He <jiatai2021@iscas.ac.cn>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: uapi: add HWCAP for Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto
Message-ID: <Y39blUaC/jHiOYCk@wendy>
References: <YqYz+xDsXr/tNaNu@Sun>
 <YqY0i22SdbHjB/MX@Sun>
 <Y385rS/5zDaDJ3Os@vermeer>
 <Y39AXYPFzSiBngwI@wendy>
 <Y39Lwp4rQc3Qkl0i@vermeer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y39Lwp4rQc3Qkl0i@vermeer>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:

> Patch #1 is definitely needed regardless of which interface we pick for
> exposing the ISA strings to userspace.

I took another look at #1, and I feel more confused about what
constitutes canonical order than I did before! If you know better than
I, and you probably do since you're interested in these 6 month old
patches, some insight would be appreciated!

Thanks,
Conor.