Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
To:     bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
        andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
        yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com,
        jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: Sanitize LDX in jited BPF progs with KASAN
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:36:29 +0800
Message-Id: <20221125063630.536657-3-sunhao.th@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221125063630.536657-1-sunhao.th@gmail.com>
References: <20221125063630.536657-1-sunhao.th@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Make the verifier sanitize LDX insns in jited BPF programs. The
dst_reg and AX are free here, different insns that backup R0&R1
are inserted based on their relationships with dst_reg and src,
all the scratch regs are backed up to extended stack space before
calling the checking functions. Finally, the checking funcs are
inserted, and regs are restored.

Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5519c24c5bd4..4e253fc20bf2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15344,6 +15344,17 @@ BPF_ASAN_STORE(16);
 BPF_ASAN_STORE(32);
 BPF_ASAN_STORE(64);
 
+#define BPF_ASAN_LOAD(n)                         \
+	notrace u64 bpf_asan_load##n(u##n *addr) \
+	{                                        \
+		return *addr;                    \
+	}
+
+BPF_ASAN_LOAD(8);
+BPF_ASAN_LOAD(16);
+BPF_ASAN_LOAD(32);
+BPF_ASAN_LOAD(64);
+
 #endif
 
 /* Do various post-verification rewrites in a single program pass.
@@ -15588,6 +15599,85 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
 			continue;
 		}
+
+		/* Sanitize LDX operation*/
+		if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX) {
+			struct bpf_insn sanitize_fn;
+			struct bpf_insn *patch = &insn_buf[0];
+			bool dst_is_r0 = insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_0;
+			bool dst_is_r1 = insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_1;
+
+			if (in_patch_use_ax || insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_10)
+				continue;
+
+			switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) {
+			case BPF_B:
+				sanitize_fn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(bpf_asan_load8);
+				break;
+			case BPF_H:
+				sanitize_fn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(bpf_asan_load16);
+				break;
+			case BPF_W:
+				sanitize_fn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(bpf_asan_load32);
+				break;
+			case BPF_DW:
+				sanitize_fn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(bpf_asan_load64);
+				break;
+			}
+
+			/* Backup R0 and R1, REG_AX and dst_reg are free. */
+			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_1) {
+				if (!dst_is_r0)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_AX, BPF_REG_0);
+			} else if (insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_0) {
+				if (!dst_is_r1)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_AX, BPF_REG_1);
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0);
+			} else if (!dst_is_r1) {
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_AX, BPF_REG_1);
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, insn->src_reg);
+				if (!dst_is_r0)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(insn->dst_reg, BPF_REG_0);
+			} else {
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, insn->src_reg);
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_AX, BPF_REG_0);
+			}
+			if (insn->off != 0)
+				*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, insn->off);
+			BACKUP_SCRATCH_REGS;
+			/* Invoke sanitize fn, R1~R5 are stored to stack during jit. */
+			*patch++ = sanitize_fn;
+			RESTORE_SCRATCH_REGS;
+			if (insn->off != 0)
+				*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -insn->off);
+			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_1) {
+				if (!dst_is_r0)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_AX);
+			} else if (insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_0) {
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
+				if (!dst_is_r1)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_AX);
+			} else if (!dst_is_r1) {
+				if (!dst_is_r0)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, insn->dst_reg);
+				if (insn->src_reg == insn->dst_reg)
+					*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(insn->src_reg, BPF_REG_1);
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_AX);
+			} else {
+				*patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_AX);
+			}
+			*patch++ = *insn;
+			cnt = patch - insn_buf;
+
+			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+			if (!new_prog)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+
+			delta += cnt - 1;
+			env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+			insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+			continue;
+		}
 #endif
 
 		if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
-- 
2.38.1