Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:16:18 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] soc: renesas: Add L2 cache management for RZ/Five
 SoC
Message-ID: <Y4CyEkzn2rqRqx+t@wendy>
References: <20221124172207.153718-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20221124172207.153718-8-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <Y3/ivrvx4A+OImtW@spud>
 <CA+V-a8uBrx-+S59_zMz6kyLurVs4z0f+WxuUKc8k3VQWuZYWWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8uBrx-+S59_zMz6kyLurVs4z0f+WxuUKc8k3VQWuZYWWA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:50:01AM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 9:31 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:

> > But yeah, this is basically the sort of stuff that'd be nice to have in
> > the previous patch!
> >
> Agreed, I'll include this in the binding patch too.

I said "the previous patch" but I meant "the previous patch that I
commented on the commit message for". I can hardly expect telepathy, so
sorry for the poor wording.