Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2022 15:32:04 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
        Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix NR_CPUS range conditions
Message-ID: <Y4IxdOPWhLLg5rwd@spud>
References: <20221126061557.3541-1-samuel@sholland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221126061557.3541-1-samuel@sholland.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 12:15:56AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The conditions reference the symbol SBI_V01, which does not exist. The
> correct symbol is RISCV_SBI_V01.

Huh, good spot.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> 
> Fixes: e623715f3d67 ("RISC-V: Increase range and default value of NR_CPUS")
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
> ---
> 
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index fec54872ab45..acbfe34c6a00 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -319,9 +319,9 @@ config SMP
>  config NR_CPUS
>  	int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-512)"
>  	depends on SMP
> -	range 2 512 if !SBI_V01
> -	range 2 32 if SBI_V01 && 32BIT
> -	range 2 64 if SBI_V01 && 64BIT
> +	range 2 512 if !RISCV_SBI_V01
> +	range 2 32 if RISCV_SBI_V01 && 32BIT
> +	range 2 64 if RISCV_SBI_V01 && 64BIT
>  	default "32" if 32BIT
>  	default "64" if 64BIT
>  
> -- 
> 2.37.4
>