Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a3b7e1f0-16cb-4284-c740-5b5874612ea4@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:33:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: amlogic: align LED node names with dtschema
Content-Language: fr
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20221125144141.477253-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <3719828c-0ac5-34c9-a04b-251cbeb5f6ef@linaro.org>
 <a135f93a-235a-27b8-f649-69d62f6ebd30@linaro.org>
 <54f500cb-d7d0-8af1-eb58-99fbe71791a5@linaro.org>
 <CAB6niQ4808JEgdQEvRvaYqq8YmFCGo_YLnxXo+rjpSgxQxu+7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <615eb86b-a00a-56bc-ae1a-9f0e4e86f77c@linaro.org>
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <615eb86b-a00a-56bc-ae1a-9f0e4e86f77c@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


Le 27/11/2022 à 13:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> On 26/11/2022 17:03, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>> Aren't you maintainer of the platform? This means I should take care of
>>>> this patch?
>>> Ah, this will be picked up by Kevin or Jerome? So this tag means only
>>> Reviewer's statement of oversight, right?
>> Of course I'll pick it.
>>
> So that's confusing to see Review which does not mean review, but
> maintainer pick...

Reviewed-by means reviewed, there's no confusion here, the significance
is clearly documented on https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html

>
> Reviewed-by means, I should take your tag and add to v2 or the
> maintainer will add it when picking up.

Reviewed-by means reviewed, fully reviewed patches are ready to
be picked unless a change is asked by a reviewer.

Decision to pick or not a patch does not depend on any tags, but
is the sole decision of the maintainer adding it's Signed-off-by.

While I use Acked-by to signify acceptance to other maintainers
on files I authored or files I maintain but cannot pick, here I don't
need to signify acceptance to myself.

Neil

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>