Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:45:31 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        amit.pundir@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org,
        quic_sibis@quicinc.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache invalidation from
 arch_dma_prep_coherent()"
Message-ID: <20221128081531.GA60329@thinkpad>
References: <20221114110329.68413-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <6a5b523d-711b-d809-06b9-fdada64c9c65@leemhuis.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <6a5b523d-711b-d809-06b9-fdada64c9c65@leemhuis.info>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:44:13AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 14.11.22 12:03, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This reverts commit c44094eee32f32f175aadc0efcac449d99b1bbf7.
> > 
> > As reported by Amit [1], dropping cache invalidation from
> > arch_dma_prep_coherent() triggers a crash on the Qualcomm SM8250 platform
> > (most probably on other Qcom platforms too). The reason is, Qcom
> > qcom_q6v5_mss driver copies the firmware metadata and shares it with modem
> > for validation. The modem has a secure block (XPU) that will trigger a
> > whole system crash if the shared memory is accessed by the CPU while modem
> > is poking at it.
> > [...]
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAMi1Hd1VBCFhf7+EXWHQWcGy4k=tcyLa7RGiFdprtRnegSG0Mw@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> 
> I have Amit's report on the list of tracked regressions. I also noticed
> the proposed change "arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: fix PCIe DMA coherency":
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221124142501.29314-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/
> 
> I have no expertise in this area, but it looked somewhat related to my
> eyes, so please allow me to quickly ask: is that related or even
> supposed to fix Amit's regression?
> 

The proposed patch doesn't fix the regression reported by Amit. But the patch
itself fixes an issue that might be triggered more frequently by c44094eee32f.

Thanks,
Mani

> Ciao, Thorsten

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்