Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:47:10 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Cc:     linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
        Lukas Magel <lukas.magel@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] can: etas_es58x: export product information
 through devlink_ops::info_get()
Message-ID: <Y4S73jX07uFAwVQv@lunn.ch>
References: <20221104073659.414147-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
 <20221126162211.93322-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
 <20221126162211.93322-4-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221126162211.93322-4-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Precedence: bulk

> devlink does not yet have a name suited for the bootloader and so this
> last piece of information is exposed to the userland for through a
> custom name: "bl".

Jiri, what do you think about 'bl'? Is it too short, not well known
enough? It could easily be 'bootloader'.

	Andrew