Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp15153603rwb; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7rIbcnz84GPiQQdeV/XzZ5VrnxLhKvEcfzqKo9YuCuYz9IAXRF2myPi6X/5JEzTQVJNzsj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ad9a:b0:7ad:8bc6:48e4 with SMTP id la26-20020a170906ad9a00b007ad8bc648e4mr30642693ejb.514.1669652957775; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:29:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669652957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S0QK46hJoqy3YxC6NORmL3MUeu2zZxOVW5XKCvyUJhoA30bceSnQrUhh64BG1IA0Nh zc0sBcq83isnOQte2VVuGxDDlryS9B3Oq9j7eeoP1jUAJIjbGjvquRS4296I7VWTfL0L T4o1sSYBEXkjFKhXTEcexiJiD7FzuBDTMIcrLRiusbNwD9mFM6Wv0r9piiYOYeIA032y RKft8u36lvdtWK+dp4o/zGjWNFvtRShCNr6NdUvQ00HwLsYnzMebATRPG6qYYFFhFz8B bA1NdROpU70CROPsNw0+wCVjgckucuibGlO95eXlwSSX6mE9/P9wYs95KQjC5cckk59d Uq+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=omHAWSGVOrqdistvF1mI4veeF3fLfIz9T/z0L/hp1Dw=; b=j5Zk6cN4Zym+Ag5mAaRPD4dIlbNYemkjW3Tou9lf9IRh/wHQRcPRPqlcL30X8E51rS oCXSM7lVspj1uRT8vFMNZ7jMK31Y6Ri0/sjnK4df0kVSTnO1bAxMshAiQEBvZvlidDRk gzKyYonC/E2QMCTZXFY6i1XUVb20cFW4Y9YfHhO5yI7ebJAQW1s0a+d37T6TMvJqj/Hq n/UagDdECwfYlO0ZCQ3enQIwOKOUyYyk2Kf03OKMZswaq4keo62ccvXnI2SnyHezTwP1 bAtiZvs/WLIW/B2WXvtFfy9lsXYnEemzf3U1OON4OFYkjKWkpwDbM6ycsAjVuJCAsmIe /a2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZpMymtbh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hz1-20020a1709072ce100b007316ac034acsi10555635ejc.834.2022.11.28.08.28.55; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZpMymtbh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231609AbiK1Pcl (ORCPT + 84 others); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:32:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42442 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232358AbiK1Pbv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:31:51 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFE127DE1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:28:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669649293; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=omHAWSGVOrqdistvF1mI4veeF3fLfIz9T/z0L/hp1Dw=; b=ZpMymtbhRxJzN3BoIMnOMoBWDVz3Vk/r9xryTovbGgTf0HuWLIxlvRftuzE0IetdE346Ab YLzB7lLJcPi4WWLsfAdVdG5JcSVSVc5tV3F6ey/h0gX3yx5bNI8UdELLcxd/F8xU9vWrIM D5TmlTor0Kir2Ik/uYfxceo3bu/fAsg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-649-EMi1OtOLOu-dlg5-KW-N1g-1; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:28:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EMi1OtOLOu-dlg5-KW-N1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818F0882826; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.10.34] (unknown [10.22.10.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A642F4B3FC8; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <60c59bed-d9aa-5e49-7a1b-d3463ff267ad@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:28:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH-block] blk-cgroup: Use css_tryget() in blkcg_destroy_blkgs() Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= Cc: Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei , Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , Hillf Danton , Yi Zhang References: <20221128033057.1279383-1-longman@redhat.com> <20221128140631.GI25160@blackbody.suse.cz> From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: <20221128140631.GI25160@blackbody.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/22 09:06, Michal Koutný wrote: > Hello. > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:30:57PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >> That may not be true if there is no blkg associated with the blkcg. If >> css_get() fails, the subsequent css_put() call may lead to data >> corruption as was illustrated in a test system that it crashed on >> bootup when that commit was included. > Do you have a stacktrace of the underflowing css_put() in > blkcg_destroy_blkgs()? > > It looks to me slightly as a mistake of the caller site that it passes > struct blkcg * without any references. > > By a cursory look, could it be cgwb_release_workfn? > > --- a/mm/backing-dev.c > +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c > @@ -390,11 +390,11 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work) > wb_shutdown(wb); > > css_put(wb->memcg_css); > - css_put(wb->blkcg_css); > mutex_unlock(&wb->bdi->cgwb_release_mutex); > > /* triggers blkg destruction if no online users left */ > blkcg_unpin_online(wb->blkcg_css); > + css_put(wb->blkcg_css); > > fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->memcg_completions); > > Does your crash involve this stack? That looks like a possible cause for the system crash that we are seeing. In my testing, I do see one case out of more than a dozen calls to blkcg_destroy_blkgs() where css_tryget() fail in the reproducing system during bootup. However, I didn't force a stack dump at that point and so I am not sure if that is the place, though it looks likely. One of the crashes that was reported does involve blkcg_unpin_online(). So maybe that is it. Cheers, Longman