Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp15355372rwb; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:33:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5p6VArBtTCQH6i/MD5pPR9PGnEIOJUzJHTzvoKmyNXjR3vR2jtZK78ZXm/awrnUQ7PHMj1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a605:b0:189:680e:c2e5 with SMTP id u5-20020a170902a60500b00189680ec2e5mr17409263plq.51.1669660431418; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:33:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669660431; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ii9NtI/IfOO8ldaBphTVzjyLq9tXalRjQZHqVuAsjuheqp4XhZUHIFG5AYlK6UNqoI D63VLm8BoJGmOIFQQeGS3wlIPRgRjSlLv5kQNUaX9btCtBy2ToQilm1Nwbu08CGrPUNX CL8jwMpjPx4F1GxkvlHP6OaFSzKFwHFAzt5OIbSo3hQlsIwu8s/sKcIwhdvhML+tw9tY DHipNCBEsiHZJ5dzZHquWGvkgR/y8kQ/bnlWpl2GAZEneG+QTvsmN4nOHq33U2Jaewx+ 6DAmDbx+WbJ4NWwllf2gM93jiQM8DDJqbBMo/aooCkw/r4vCdVbDwGEfRHwEICdjFViQ TjKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ErTRVa0Cyf9sNDMe6IyBe4JlClLfF0FxZX4B4tTFJIk=; b=ia6qTSfy6WB4WYjG8nXKKCLXSKQfNzmwnLOWRsh6ERAtm7KBjtrjs+Ns8wFL+spCu3 lY6qZuouC84PblRE/yTlTzHFSoR3HXeWOcPlvUs40qFnR3lJB9Vu8GNHbLsxlGFNQJ9d deHy9H2x+7G2isUdxWiv7ra9OXKzE9aNXlSuNiEupgzciMVe1IqZ7PoXG983fVRp3HRQ onWhpGoKSIKBuMO0igpft3pcLFAXFN0GxUJzq9fdlN3N1MzadAScklRWi9RNqkdU5JJo 54XmmRqIE0l1+QyLZ8HfHWvMyVbJCUJEtmFNiL4VrTIGLKtps44UWxNoUUnMLEdIlggK 99RA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ZAwj+ynP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l2-20020a170902f68200b00182c51058ffsi448373plg.201.2022.11.28.10.33.39; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ZAwj+ynP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233652AbiK1SHR (ORCPT + 85 others); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:07:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46046 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234079AbiK1SGx (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:06:53 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451DF58BE3; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:51:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669657910; x=1701193910; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=W6IrZ/8bGVrH3jH1rhZvl21yo0uj8ope8p+0Md2pCZc=; b=ZAwj+ynPSVBlGprTf0+zFY5T/PAlqz96jLsOuDGJCrAv8FS2DrcIsl31 NrulcKcI438wUHnf4feXvt0VRg4WBXoidfZf6YYiMDh6sdN6FpxqvWVHD xc875lh0QzNdfj+Dkjhu6T2mdVpNduW9Ow70C0b0VdsRTjNAU4CEN9LRZ dMJdzLr33X/sEXwwmaeTpp3VFfzdchmR/MYHc/Jcf9aQadZyg+LcGTy9V IVsVN5wfLbwpYq1mYZdwTeK8dukztU/69Y6BUVdeOtMnfJf0C8JXPH7Y2 mZ9VwedVn/rCLOjbzsqzrEnZIhTTa3PE2tagLypZGo5fszYFqdOcpnQ4v g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10545"; a="377050405" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,200,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="377050405" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2022 09:51:49 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10545"; a="621140222" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,200,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="621140222" Received: from aschofie-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO aschofie-mobl2) ([10.209.3.241]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2022 09:51:49 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:51:47 -0800 From: Alison Schofield To: ira.weiny@intel.com Cc: Dan Williams , Bjorn Helgaas , Lukas Wunner , Jonathan Cameron , Vishal Verma , Gregory Price , "Li, Ming" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] PCI/DOE: Remove the pci_doe_flush_mb() call Message-ID: References: <20221128040338.1936529-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20221128040338.1936529-2-ira.weiny@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221128040338.1936529-2-ira.weiny@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 08:03:37PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > From: Ira Weiny > > pci_doe_flush_mb() does not work and is currently unused. > > It does not work because each struct doe_mb is managed as part of the > PCI device. They can't go away as long as the PCI device exists. > pci_doe_flush_mb() was set up to flush the workqueue and prevent any > further submissions to the mailboxes when the PCI device goes away. > Unfortunately, this was fundamentally flawed. There was no guarantee > that a struct doe_mb remained after pci_doe_flush_mb() returned. > Therefore, the doe_mb state could be invalid when those threads waiting > on the workqueue were flushed. > > Fortunately the current code is safe because all callers make a > synchronous call to pci_doe_submit_task() and maintain a reference on > the PCI device. Therefore pci_doe_flush_mb() is effectively unused. > > Rather than attempt to fix pci_doe_flush_mb() just remove the dead code > around pci_doe_flush_mb(). The commit message says "Remove ...." and the commit log only talks about removing code, yet an msleep() is added. Can those be clearer? > > Cc: Lukas Wunner > Cc: Jonathan Cameron > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny > > --- > Changes from V2: > Lukas > Clarify commit message. > Jonathan > Add comment for changed poll interval. > --- > drivers/pci/doe.c | 49 +++++------------------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c > index e402f05068a5..685e7d26c7eb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c > @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ > > /* Timeout of 1 second from 6.30.2 Operation, PCI Spec r6.0 */ > #define PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT HZ > -#define PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL (PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT / 128) > +/* Interval to poll mailbox status */ > +#define PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL_MSECS 8 > > -#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL 0 > -#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD 1 > +#define PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD 0 > > /** > * struct pci_doe_mb - State for a single DOE mailbox > @@ -53,15 +53,6 @@ struct pci_doe_mb { > unsigned long flags; > }; > > -static int pci_doe_wait(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, unsigned long timeout) > -{ > - if (wait_event_timeout(doe_mb->wq, > - test_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL, &doe_mb->flags), > - timeout)) > - return -EIO; > - return 0; > -} > - > static void pci_doe_write_ctrl(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u32 val) > { > struct pci_dev *pdev = doe_mb->pdev; > @@ -82,12 +73,9 @@ static int pci_doe_abort(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) > pci_doe_write_ctrl(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_CTRL_ABORT); > > do { > - int rc; > u32 val; > > - rc = pci_doe_wait(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > - if (rc) > - return rc; > + msleep_interruptible(PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL_MSECS); > pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_STATUS, &val); > > /* Abort success! */ > @@ -278,11 +266,7 @@ static void doe_statemachine_work(struct work_struct *work) > signal_task_abort(task, -EIO); > return; > } > - rc = pci_doe_wait(doe_mb, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL); > - if (rc) { > - signal_task_abort(task, rc); > - return; > - } > + msleep_interruptible(PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL_MSECS); > goto retry_resp; > } > > @@ -383,21 +367,6 @@ static void pci_doe_destroy_workqueue(void *mb) > destroy_workqueue(doe_mb->work_queue); > } > > -static void pci_doe_flush_mb(void *mb) > -{ > - struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb = mb; > - > - /* Stop all pending work items from starting */ > - set_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD, &doe_mb->flags); > - > - /* Cancel an in progress work item, if necessary */ > - set_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_CANCEL, &doe_mb->flags); > - wake_up(&doe_mb->wq); > - > - /* Flush all work items */ > - flush_workqueue(doe_mb->work_queue); > -} > - > /** > * pcim_doe_create_mb() - Create a DOE mailbox object > * > @@ -450,14 +419,6 @@ struct pci_doe_mb *pcim_doe_create_mb(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 cap_offset) > return ERR_PTR(rc); > } > > - /* > - * The state machine and the mailbox should be in sync now; > - * Set up mailbox flush prior to using the mailbox to query protocols. > - */ > - rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, pci_doe_flush_mb, doe_mb); > - if (rc) > - return ERR_PTR(rc); > - > rc = pci_doe_cache_protocols(doe_mb); > if (rc) { > pci_err(pdev, "[%x] failed to cache protocols : %d\n", > -- > 2.37.2 >