Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0390c62d-11d9-5d89-ad88-db38526b74e6@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:08:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH-block] blk-cgroup: Use css_tryget() in
 blkcg_destroy_blkgs()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= <mkoutny@suse.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
References: <20221128033057.1279383-1-longman@redhat.com>
 <d08a0059-7c0b-d65f-d184-5b0cb75c08ed@acm.org>
 <f89e922c-16d5-0bcf-7e7e-096f42793a36@kernel.dk>
 <Y4UG9H9QsMnCvN+D@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <Y4UG9H9QsMnCvN+D@smile.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/28/22 12:07 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/28/22 11:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 11/27/22 19:30, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> Fixes: 951d1e94801f ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
>>>
>>> Has Jens' for-next branch perhaps been rebased? I see the following commit ID for that patch:
>>>
>>> dae590a6c96c ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
>>
>> I don't know that sha is from, not from me. for-6.2/block has not been
>> rebased, for-next gets rebased whenever I need to do so as linux-next is
>> continually rebased anyway. But the sha for that commit would not change
>> as a result.
>>
>> I don't even have that sha in my tree, so...
> 
> $ git tag --contains dae590a6c96c
> next-20221117
> next-20221118
> next-20221121
> next-20221122
> next-20221123
> next-20221124
> next-20221125
> next-20221128

That is the right sha, I'm talking about the fixes line in the
patch you're replying to:

Fixes: 951d1e94801f ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")

which is certainly not from my tree.

-- 
Jens Axboe