Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:48:53 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] rxrpc: Increasing SACK size and moving
 away from softirq, part 2
Message-ID: <20221128104853.25665813@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1869061.1669273688@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
References: <20221123192335.119335ac@kernel.org>
        <166919798040.1256245.11495568684139066955.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
        <1869061.1669273688@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 07:08:08 +0000 David Howells wrote:
> What's the best way to base on a fix commit that's in net for patches in
> net-next?  Here I tried basing on a merge between them.  Should I include the
> fix patch on my net-next branch instead? Or will net be merged into net-next
> at some point and I should wait for that?

We merge net -> net-next each Thursday afternoon (LT / Linus Time)
so if the wait is for something in net then we generally ask for folks
to just hold off posting until the merge. If the dependency is the
other way then just post based on what's in tree and provide the
conflict resolution in the cover letter.