Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp420215rwb; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 23:49:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5jJzNhr9DHXvUuEtdpjEH4xr0JzSIazgt5AtXssnMpIiyzPR3QgjcULK6n32NNbcJ1gtvS X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db91:0:b0:458:bd09:1b20 with SMTP id u17-20020aa7db91000000b00458bd091b20mr51499995edt.176.1669708156725; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 23:49:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669708156; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xu+9aXtUTX1mvBLVHQZ3b6JYUB5mW3W+lPTp+C0uoHO6qPm7Nq/depXJwV9BgYd8dK lKtKmj9a9SL+S5neJkvhtE6S3tsRQez+9rNTMi6Npj2B3xcl1QlFh3u+htSGAo+ahP8X sDzyZt7BF5dbAKswgQbFhk2xiaNQFQ8QG1ZFM8Uf54rodSWmnlRc8o+ScjQnuu9WLLLR O24QxGU+lCzqkocMCO9aiRO6tri6JU8UPOrL+maAHXMGk8jwlfRpFLbA+ZdoAr5QNB/Y UVHrR+dSbGt6rzJ8reSjsC7e/BoCVDf+yjGXRAIDP9/wTCQV9AlDrnboIiFUlmpUUUFP HSdg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=lsYjIHaYB/dssEBVD28R9pkJ7ZduzmGwaijbboDQSZk=; b=tT4PE+75f6aoc+zxfYXIX0RtmEGFg/pqBoLJAhXiQrw0mgXBmJr+YaVwodFakQliIj C4IqEQ51yoIBYmFEPYEKmQY7NShu5xjqCQylbg+R/aNaeBJptS5P4dc43z1TH4QV0RWn aff0cA2ouCms8aQHycav8uavvydHLFTh9l0OnOIWNvEY4lUTUGl4IJYDAQfGojUsovEF qWEOPF4oyIG1+vCUNtG90ZAGmEz9l5uochSZt08gdH3YI7tzRoVe43pPgUziUlkAxiej qndUIEl2uUZJt71NYLSU5wVmq28hswFMXJF2UJEipwlAn0OPi1umTCwXVFyYOg8SGSSv PByQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="1/5RPRoV"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gs12-20020a1709072d0c00b0078d78fbb88dsi10066607ejc.967.2022.11.28.23.48.56; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 23:49:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="1/5RPRoV"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229820AbiK2Heq (ORCPT + 82 others); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:34:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34624 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229702AbiK2Hem (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:34:42 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631274AF16; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 23:34:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089C3615B7; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F934C433C1; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:34:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1669707279; bh=tECsQ2ZfxkV3bC+b6iryBrVJE0Vaq25uaQkwxanlCRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1/5RPRoVUoYxJuBAFwxOgZgr2PerUlLxDFto8NeSYjubJ/m2raYQ7Yi/yv4/FeN67 NTD72Pq4gG9HAkXqECN94NAlvAXzNMVfDFT8jFP3I9Juw7aAVlt927QoIJDZ/dEhs7 b4lJLfHDNq2U55xdEHQ9jzGzsGmSpj6RITbGG6eE= Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:34:37 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Wang Yufen Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] USB: FHCI: fix error return code in of_fhci_probe() Message-ID: References: <1669707158-43984-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1669707158-43984-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 03:32:38PM +0800, Wang Yufen wrote: > Fix to return a negative error code of PTR_ERR(fhci->gpiods[i]) > instead of 0. > > Fixes: a4efdb8a423b ("USB: FHCI: Switch to GPIO descriptors") > Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen > Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol > --- > drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c > index 95a4446..f84f1c8 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c > @@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int of_fhci_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) > NULL, i, GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > if (IS_ERR(fhci->gpiods[i])) { > - dev_err(dev, "incorrect GPIO%d: %ld\n", > - i, PTR_ERR(fhci->gpiods[i])); > + ret = PTR_ERR(fhci->gpiods[i]); > + dev_err(dev, "incorrect GPIO%d: %d\n", i, ret); > goto err_gpios; > } > if (!fhci->gpiods[i]) { > -- > 1.8.3.1 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot