Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp742563rwb; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:59:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4KZj8n1bzBg5p5QN2BGbtnBbomXvBpNmk08qEmZdVZjCufAkLUtzDkVUH8mEwsIvWWSGER X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:710b:b0:218:725:c820 with SMTP id h11-20020a17090a710b00b002180725c820mr59920112pjk.170.1669726750646; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:59:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669726750; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tiIby9iq5WUfoI6qMO7ZOxkgv4yM0Wm0tGPv9mYkkwPcruTGtXTbLzG/G5zkBG5gdd FEIYogRC0oZDWn1ZfbOUB5OpHOup5F3sWxbgIgs3vsV77yY9ZaGBNAWF4I9013I8Ospx mdxuOo0tD+78qrEuoQpa1adOVzdx6mbW7q4MG5LETCWiC/FwVd9EyZEPECwHeV1zwx0w 7d/JgGThwzBK95vUTKqEDR1y131M+sS+Pokb4Eje+c6teAVHy2Sc07PUdTFxN3JTVtTu guaO1akK3J/JWBdIlDsbpXH3iCKLxHI4wDGR3Gjf4BhYn9xzq5s+U1pfw0uvtIbJXVHj FJNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :organization:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=9biOik4bb/vsRWeA7iYMe9MmaLQDkW/ZscxtJbvobFw=; b=04qRJqM772YieH1Lz6oQj2W6mZi8Dut8Dila4jmDEclHWzLnSe6z7YT3awkUdDhbwl qRpLyzKmvNUfiuJbns8b/bqzZWBR5oqKoFRbldzBbkSA2NH8v0awvf5k3FjTTbrmfSC0 XQ6H3h6a9tt1cIWZgB88xhGs71BqLjhS9IqVMgKREAUa5NJ+sg29hck8e0jEh04aO5hx YDrzAmL86JSjhwOh07HZG5a3yQ4nSVhwMOdKjNocpVlC61yrBmIxx7zZ4vDAMavbQAKq zY09apyXiiJWshuiWICGxT88HEq1mIclxk37IGacCQYA9FpCi8RCucn1QzgVt3TX7pjZ mq2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=WLJIWurn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3-20020a170903028300b00186bb2e85c4si6168699plr.429.2022.11.29.04.58.59; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=WLJIWurn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234417AbiK2MhE (ORCPT + 83 others); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:37:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58572 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234655AbiK2Mg7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:36:59 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B912C5DBAF; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:36:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669725418; x=1701261418; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:from: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ot6kpQYnmX13LuLXGQO8dgigBK9nXEKIxDZ7nwCo+o=; b=WLJIWurnoIkB1hg94welQ5zQB8T8vFqGWa33tjNuVBPsw5uz+FBS9NxY rs1+SjiV1iAAf0AJBI5bFSj3E124/JXwS2oFA/zKCS3HcfmA3JWpRfWW3 8+LvPYDHg6rJiqamstJgI/17z6IAudJPM6uXcBhUb8t0TINqzZQRE8yy4 I6pvkKZIOvt9MGhFw4AolsgsGjH1la/tSvWJQfj0Se/M0M4QWb7uFFBlZ TjAC+qpYr0EYSmG8PnW+Qpb45qubMdkFkSBpgwMSj+inWOD7InPLLjZVl wR5+aBVLzw9sAq1acRtoruAPoNl/9FGY+xhvfFlxkHnlq+0eitWj6ZrAZ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10545"; a="298446192" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,203,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="298446192" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2022 04:36:58 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10545"; a="676411105" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,203,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="676411105" Received: from ahunter6-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.0.2.15]) ([10.252.34.177]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2022 04:36:56 -0800 Message-ID: <8f2329cf-d482-7147-bd72-b8832e9bf123@intel.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:36:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mmc: block: remove non-data R1B ioctl workaround Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_L=c3=b6hle?= , Avri Altman , "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <57d4aceb25254e448bd3e575bd99b0c2@hyperstone.com> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki In-Reply-To: <57d4aceb25254e448bd3e575bd99b0c2@hyperstone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/11/22 19:46, Christian Löhle wrote: > The workaround of pretending R1B non-data transfers are > data transfers in order for the busy timeout to be respected > by the host controller driver is removed. It wasn't useful > in a long time. > > Initially the workaround ensured that R1B commands did not > time out by setting the data timeout to be the command timeout > in commit cb87ea28ed9e ("mmc: core: Add mmc CMD+ACMD passthrough ioctl"). > This was moved inside of an if clause with idata->buf_bytes being set > in commit 4d6144de8ba2 ("mmc: core: check for zero length ioctl data"). > Since the workaround is now inside of the idata->buf_bytes clause > and intended to fix R1B non-data transfers that do not have buf_bytes > set we can also remove the workaround altogether. > Since there are no data transfer invoking R1B commands this was dead > code. > > Fixes: cb87ea28ed9e ("mmc: core: Add mmc CMD+ACMD passthrough ioctl") > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle Doesn't Fixes: 4d6144de8ba2 make more sense? Otherwise: Acked-by: Adrian Hunter > --- > -v2: clarified commit message, no code change > drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 13 ------------- > 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c > index db6d8a099910..20da7ed43e6d 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c > @@ -514,19 +514,6 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md, > if (idata->ic.data_timeout_ns) > data.timeout_ns = idata->ic.data_timeout_ns; > > - if ((cmd.flags & MMC_RSP_R1B) == MMC_RSP_R1B) { > - /* > - * Pretend this is a data transfer and rely on the > - * host driver to compute timeout. When all host > - * drivers support cmd.cmd_timeout for R1B, this > - * can be changed to: > - * > - * mrq.data = NULL; > - * cmd.cmd_timeout = idata->ic.cmd_timeout_ms; > - */ > - data.timeout_ns = idata->ic.cmd_timeout_ms * 1000000; > - } > - > mrq.data = &data; > } >