Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:47:28 +0530
From:   Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
        dm-devel@redhat.com, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
        sagi@grimberg.me, james.smart@broadcom.com, kch@nvidia.com,
        naohiro.aota@wdc.com, jth@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        anuj20.g@samsung.com, joshi.k@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
        nitheshshetty@gmail.com, gost.dev@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] fs: add support for copy file range in zonefs
Message-ID: <20221130041728.GB17533@test-zns>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b22652ee-9cca-a5b1-e9f1-862ed8f0354d@opensource.wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
        boundary="----GsYAgckb8ZPIB7TqR4NYyp-jgnPv5c.LE-kW9H5hDU_d1TDU=_80488_"
CMS-TYPE: 105P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <20221123055827.26996-1-nj.shetty@samsung.com>
        <CGME20221123061044epcas5p2ac082a91fc8197821f29e84278b6203c@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
        <20221123055827.26996-11-nj.shetty@samsung.com>
        <729254f8-2468-e694-715e-72bcbef80ff3@opensource.wdc.com>
        <349a4d66-3a9f-a095-005c-1f180c5f3aac@opensource.wdc.com>
        <20221129122232.GC16802@test-zns>
        <b22652ee-9cca-a5b1-e9f1-862ed8f0354d@opensource.wdc.com>
Precedence: bulk

------GsYAgckb8ZPIB7TqR4NYyp-jgnPv5c.LE-kW9H5hDU_d1TDU=_80488_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:45:55AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 11/29/22 21:22, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> > Acked. I do see a gap in current zonefs cfr implementation. I will drop this
> 
> cfr ?
>

yes, will drop zonefs cfr for next version.

> > implementation for next version. Once we finalize on block copy offload
> > implementation, will re-pick this and send with above reviews fixed.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Nitesh
> 
> Please trim your replies.
> 

Noted

> 
> -- 
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
> 
> 

Thanks,
Nitesh Shetty

------GsYAgckb8ZPIB7TqR4NYyp-jgnPv5c.LE-kW9H5hDU_d1TDU=_80488_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


------GsYAgckb8ZPIB7TqR4NYyp-jgnPv5c.LE-kW9H5hDU_d1TDU=_80488_--