Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc 0/2] Fix sge_num bug
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
CC:     <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20221108133847.2304539-1-xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com>
 <Y3gh+am3+KRMzbMk@nvidia.com>
From:   "xuhaoyue (A)" <xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com>
Message-ID: <a6c8867d-6c33-3baf-f672-bd235e839119@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:59:13 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Y3gh+am3+KRMzbMk@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Sorry about that. I will pay more attention to the commit messages in the future.
Could you give me some advice about it? Which patch makes it confusing?

Thanks,
haoyue

On 2022/11/19 8:23:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:38:45PM +0800, Haoyue Xu wrote:
>> The patchset mainly fixes the sge_num bug relates to sq_inline.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> 1. Move the refactor rq_inline and new CQE inline patches to go 
>> into for-next after this bugfix apply.
>> 2. Change the commit message to better explain the bug.
>> V2 Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/20221026095054.2384620-1-xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com/
>>
>> Luoyouming (2):
>>   RDMA/hns: Fix ext_sge num error when post send
>>   RDMA/hns: Fix the problem of sge nums
> 
> It is still not clear what the bugs are from the commit messages, and
> the second is a bit big, so I put this in for-next
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> .
>