Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc:     Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] time/namespace: Refactor copy-pasted helper into
 one copy
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1_uq6a4rq_89Ua=2P1jSsDV7u4fCh2y13X9v2JfC5MsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20221129191839.2471308-1-jannh@google.com>
 <CAG48ez1_uq6a4rq_89Ua=2P1jSsDV7u4fCh2y13X9v2JfC5MsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:57:14 +0100
Message-ID: <87k03cu2ut.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 30 2022 at 11:15, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 8:18 PM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>> find_timens_vvar_page() is not arch-specific, as can be seen from how all
>> five per-architecture versions of it are the same.
>> (arm64, powerpc and riscv are exactly the same; x86 and s390 have two
>> characters difference inside a comment, less blank lines, and mark the
>> !CONFIG_TIME_NS version as inline.)
>>
>> Refactor the five copies into a central copy in kernel/time/namespace.c.
>>
>> Marked for stable backporting because it is a prerequisite for the
>> following patch.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
>
> Should I resend this one without the Cc stable as a standalone cleanup patch?

Yes, please.