Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221130070158.44221-1-chengkaitao@didiglobal.com> <fd28321c-5f00-ba94-daed-2b8da2292c1f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fd28321c-5f00-ba94-daed-2b8da2292c1f@gmail.com>
From:   Tao pilgrim <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:33:01 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAWJmAYPUK+1GBS0R460pDvDKrLr9zs_X2LT2yQTP_85kND5Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: protect the memory in cgroup from being
 oom killed
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc:     tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        corbet@lwn.net, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
        shakeelb@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        songmuchun@bytedance.com, cgel.zte@gmail.com,
        ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
        haolee.swjtu@gmail.com, yuzhao@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
        vasily.averin@linux.dev, vbabka@suse.cz, surenb@google.com,
        sfr@canb.auug.org.au, mcgrof@kernel.org, sujiaxun@uniontech.com,
        feng.tang@intel.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        chengkaitao@didiglobal.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/22 14:01, chengkaitao wrote:
> > From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
> >
>
> Yikes! Another patch from ZTE guys.
>
> I'm suspicious to patches sent from them due to bad reputation with
> kernel development community. First, they sent all patches via
> cgel.zte@gmail.com (listed in Cc) but Greg can't sure these are really
> sent from them ([1] & [2]). Then they tried to workaround by sending
> from their personal Gmail accounts, again with same response from him
> [3]. And finally they sent spoofed emails (as he pointed out in [4]) -
> they pretend to send from ZTE domain but actually sent from their
> different domain (see raw message and look for X-Google-Original-From:
> header.

Hi Bagas Sanjaya,

I'm not an employee of ZTE, just an ordinary developer. I really don't know
all the details about community and ZTE, The reason why I cc cgel.zte@gmail.com
is because the output of the script <get_maintainer.pl> has the
address <cgel.zte@gmail.com>.

If there is any error in the format of the email, I will try my best
to correct it.

>
> I was about to review documentation part of this patch, but due to
> concerns above, I have to write this reply instead. So I'm not going
> to review, sorry for inconvenience.
>
> PS: Adding Greg to Cc: list.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yw94xsOp6gvdS0UF@kroah.com/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yylv5hbSBejJ58nt@kroah.com/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@kroah.com/
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3NrBvIV7lH2GrWz@kroah.com/
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
>


-- 
Yours,
Kaitao Cheng