Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp2263930rwb; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:41:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4bjcDAPokB+83WFC+lz6VLZ4n323raGVYVo57wD1DRUnkZJ0r1FtapoO/LEQ0zBGXUAB7z X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce90:b0:186:d89d:f0aa with SMTP id f16-20020a170902ce9000b00186d89df0aamr55540925plg.50.1669812087925; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:41:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669812087; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PXBOR+PP3kZNe8fCdsUFsKxDBeU447r0MXToVe5QK9a0+mzEjyiAX19tNKE0MfNp2Y Ke/nVOZI1L0PR88ai8wMpVRtXHn+YSfzzp3EpPztOakVmMka8PePkPo1xJ9tEp2jJKEq AfX17h3cmgWJSuRYtDZtaREivhyu83oJtZSMPuNCQ0rYWT2x+nsZ9O3KSNg1mtUm58wJ d7SA/Z+5x8BhIzlGTSh0LFaKDsqKpA2eeC8XnK6HTBjhdqY49Iid4IaGjHKIrDIKo9cS jaRX6rR5tfpez8Ov4hnLSm5Qw3J32LtxnGDV1xDlw5jd94XywL1LEt6NLu4oeCL7+4F7 bOmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Ipra9xNvK7zUHW50btDvPA1gIDzlZPxM71INtvhJruo=; b=SMTY93J4yqWHjwXbewCBV0U89OgCy+p5eUeKEqeGy63SyI6HhaZJHAzCJiFm9Ns9N4 l56V9WPpVOq9ypKMHVtSf6+cLCz8bRncWqPo1m9Vh7/8NmBoyL8nvX2jW9qa/dcglDHC SX9ppxGuQPT6LaGlTljWo3sqk0zuv5Dzs9z76OJ/cbDfnPBKzuBbKfooR2drcfOEMVfs VOqVQGyRz0GL+oGP8999RHQMZvCyenyRRqOPgRBPuqP2hnuPaTI82MZf/rP6+2ucLH21 O71xgg9JbYtiLzqOdIxhSFse0I/H72E44kCrvlk8nT6RNHbjY2BHCJ84bLwlyE1KBOQL 1blw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=rZLmlUNp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x64-20020a638643000000b00477ba9ec461si1112811pgd.879.2022.11.30.04.41.16; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:41:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=rZLmlUNp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229760AbiK3Lpi (ORCPT + 84 others); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:45:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229891AbiK3Lpc (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:45:32 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-x112a.google.com (mail-yw1-x112a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4D91C934 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 03:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x112a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3bf4ade3364so118094037b3.3 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 03:45:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ipra9xNvK7zUHW50btDvPA1gIDzlZPxM71INtvhJruo=; b=rZLmlUNpe044IndLptcsGq8sOePvnfCiRHH1FfMW2F3IMn04z4WnFEk4c+iju1ggJc ite924O1CTo6En2d6DRFtDiMwMOSx6u3ZYKEsXTdh2Wk4rpWjpk5GLSFCD5TvCQC2Di4 ZOUYFHzJfNn1qZsRci8wVZuSMlCCAhpUoBbxELOPHLoXBnFyXGF8nfV5yn46PV1Ahh0V 9ro52EkimI4ljN4cz8dUymezEXRvIBs4NR8QiK1qzV678wEjjutJuY82pJJJJIMcCCuG 0t3xaZ/uE1HgI6yykILB31qKDAEzem2i+TFWuKN4nRVLBR1/6SafW1SR/nvresXDXud+ rjFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Ipra9xNvK7zUHW50btDvPA1gIDzlZPxM71INtvhJruo=; b=ZbPwwoNiZ3Oxaf8ArPMCU0oBMXNc5+70DDBfLn1tQcJYUUytEhmMkT2nLrMcqElsGk QHbSS1b7YAUIPd9NYxZ3bpCu2ZA11yX4LCgCsgWUhbYNuoQlpY5uZ0EVgsd7MDRqyipb /V5rKPS7pfYqLPNMPQhbwkacY2cKD5F+gxS31sjXvaDBWUGKaU+4JBgMUwfiaEXgyVqS MPQY/6UG3paa7OSt2aCmtViRl5aI0Ijb6qXoSX6fXEV8sKgwL7tYHppIJ41/iu03Arm0 RTKfJfLFuNyVyUWLnY5U7f0LDIrbENzLK3lEq6fI/tNy/VMw4EQKkLB63ChqIAW+8GJG C3rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnSVPmHpwCKiawSc2foWutdVnBDSgluOkJG63Kz4S35oQG5F7W/ 4ZXiFQQNFbqMaSflOBYynozaZgKhZYnzq6KoXj2FiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a81:4902:0:b0:3c4:bb7a:9443 with SMTP id w2-20020a814902000000b003c4bb7a9443mr16619753ywa.138.1669808730483; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 03:45:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221130112852.2977816-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> <20221130112852.2977816-9-abel.vesa@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20221130112852.2977816-9-abel.vesa@linaro.org> From: Dmitry Baryshkov Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:45:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add support for SM8550 rpmh clocks To: Abel Vesa Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 13:30, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Adds the RPMH clocks present in SM8550 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c > index 0471bab82464..3204df3fda86 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c > @@ -132,6 +132,36 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmh_clk_lock); > }, \ > } > > +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_FIXED(_platform, _name, _name_active, \ > + _parent_name, _name_active_parent, \ > + _div) \ > + static struct clk_fixed_factor _platform##_##_name = { \ > + .mult = 1, \ > + .div = _div, \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops, \ > + .name = #_name, \ > + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \ > + .fw_name = #_parent_name, \ > + .name = #_parent_name, \ > + }, \ > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + }; \ > + static struct clk_fixed_factor _platform##_##_name_active = { \ > + .mult = 1, \ > + .div = _div, \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops, \ > + .name = #_name_active, \ > + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \ > + .fw_name = #_name_active_parent,\ > + .name = #_name_active_parent, \ > + }, \ > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + } > + Please use CLK_FIXED_FACTOR_FW_NAME() instead. > static inline struct clk_rpmh *to_clk_rpmh(struct clk_hw *_hw) > { > return container_of(_hw, struct clk_rpmh, hw); > @@ -579,6 +609,43 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8450 = { > .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8450_rpmh_clocks), > }; > > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sm8550, xo_pad, xo_pad_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x03, 2); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_FIXED(sm8550, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, xo_pad, xo_pad_ao, 2); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "clka1", 1); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "clka2", 1); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "clka3", 1); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, rf_clk4, rf_clk4_ao, "clka4", 1); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, "clka6", 2); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "clka7", 2); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8550, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "clka8", 2); > + > +static struct clk_hw *sm8550_rpmh_clocks[] = { > + [RPMH_CXO_PAD_CLK] = &sm8550_xo_pad.hw, > + [RPMH_CXO_PAD_CLK_A] = &sm8550_xo_pad_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &sm8550_bi_tcxo.hw, > + [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A] = &sm8550_bi_tcxo_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk1.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk1_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk2.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk2_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk3.hw, > + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm8550_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK1] = &sm8550_rf_clk1.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm8550_rf_clk1_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK2] = &sm8550_rf_clk2.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm8550_rf_clk2_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK3] = &sm8550_rf_clk3.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK3_A] = &sm8550_rf_clk3_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK4] = &sm8550_rf_clk4.hw, > + [RPMH_RF_CLK4_A] = &sm8550_rf_clk4_ao.hw, > + [RPMH_IPA_CLK] = &sdm845_ipa.hw, > +}; > + > +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8550 = { > + .clks = sm8550_rpmh_clocks, > + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_rpmh_clocks), > +}; > + > static struct clk_hw *sc7280_rpmh_clocks[] = { > [RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &sc7280_bi_tcxo.hw, > [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A] = &sc7280_bi_tcxo_ao.hw, > @@ -682,29 +749,31 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > name = hw_clks[i]->init->name; > > - rpmh_clk = to_clk_rpmh(hw_clks[i]); > - res_addr = cmd_db_read_addr(rpmh_clk->res_name); > - if (!res_addr) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing RPMh resource address for %s\n", > - rpmh_clk->res_name); > - return -ENODEV; > - } > + if (hw_clks[i]->init->ops != &clk_fixed_factor_ops) { This looks ugly a bit. I'd rather add something like non_cmd_clks to the clk_rpmh_desc data and register them separately. Or even worse, you can keep the rpmh as is, with only cmd-db based clocks and add a fixed factor clock to the sm8550 dtsi directly. I have a slight preference for the former method, but the latter would also work. > + rpmh_clk = to_clk_rpmh(hw_clks[i]); > + res_addr = cmd_db_read_addr(rpmh_clk->res_name); > + if (!res_addr) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing RPMh resource address for %s\n", > + rpmh_clk->res_name); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > > - data = cmd_db_read_aux_data(rpmh_clk->res_name, &aux_data_len); > - if (IS_ERR(data)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(data); > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, > - "error reading RPMh aux data for %s (%d)\n", > - rpmh_clk->res_name, ret); > - return ret; > - } > + data = cmd_db_read_aux_data(rpmh_clk->res_name, &aux_data_len); > + if (IS_ERR(data)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(data); > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "error reading RPMh aux data for %s (%d)\n", > + rpmh_clk->res_name, ret); > + return ret; > + } > > - /* Convert unit from Khz to Hz */ > - if (aux_data_len == sizeof(*data)) > - rpmh_clk->unit = le32_to_cpu(data->unit) * 1000ULL; > + /* Convert unit from Khz to Hz */ > + if (aux_data_len == sizeof(*data)) > + rpmh_clk->unit = le32_to_cpu(data->unit) * 1000ULL; > > - rpmh_clk->res_addr += res_addr; > - rpmh_clk->dev = &pdev->dev; > + rpmh_clk->res_addr += res_addr; > + rpmh_clk->dev = &pdev->dev; > + } > > ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, hw_clks[i]); > if (ret) { > @@ -739,6 +808,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250}, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8350}, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8450}, > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8550}, > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7280}, > { } > }; > -- > 2.34.1 > -- With best wishes Dmitry