Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:09:03 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20221130230934.1014142-20-seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/50] KVM: arm64: Do arm/arch initialization without
 bouncing through kvm_init()
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
        Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
        "=?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?=" <philmd@linaro.org>,
        Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Do arm/arch specific initialization directly in arm's module_init(), now
called kvm_arm_init(), instead of bouncing through kvm_init() to reach
kvm_arch_init().  Invoking kvm_arch_init() is the very first action
performed by kvm_init(), so from a initialization perspective this is a
glorified nop.

Avoiding kvm_arch_init() also fixes a mostly benign bug as kvm_arch_exit()
doesn't properly unwind if a later stage of kvm_init() fails.  While the
soon-to-be-deleted comment about compiling as a module being unsupported
is correct, kvm_arch_exit() can still be called by kvm_init() if any step
after the call to kvm_arch_init() succeeds.

Add a FIXME to call out that pKVM initialization isn't unwound if
kvm_init() fails, which is a pre-existing problem inherited from
kvm_arch_exit().

Making kvm_arch_init() a nop will also allow dropping kvm_arch_init() and
kvm_arch_exit() entirely once all other architectures follow suit.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index e6f6fcfe6bcc..d3a4db1abf32 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
 /**
  * Initialize Hyp-mode and memory mappings on all CPUs.
  */
-int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
+int kvm_arm_init(void)
 {
 	int err;
 	bool in_hyp_mode;
@@ -2269,6 +2269,14 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
 		kvm_info("Hyp mode initialized successfully\n");
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: Do something reasonable if kvm_init() fails after pKVM
+	 * hypervisor protection is finalized.
+	 */
+	err = kvm_init(NULL, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 0, THIS_MODULE);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_subs;
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_subs:
@@ -2281,10 +2289,15 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
 	return err;
 }
 
+int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* NOP: Compiling as a module not supported */
 void kvm_arch_exit(void)
 {
-	kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks();
+
 }
 
 static int __init early_kvm_mode_cfg(char *arg)
@@ -2325,10 +2338,4 @@ enum kvm_mode kvm_get_mode(void)
 	return kvm_mode;
 }
 
-static int arm_init(void)
-{
-	int rc = kvm_init(NULL, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 0, THIS_MODULE);
-	return rc;
-}
-
-module_init(arm_init);
+module_init(kvm_arm_init);
-- 
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog