Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:08:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20221130230934.1014142-3-seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/50] KVM: Initialize IRQ FD after arch hardware setup
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
        Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
        "=?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?=" <philmd@linaro.org>,
        Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Move initialization of KVM's IRQ FD workqueue below arch hardware setup
as a step towards consolidating arch "init" and "hardware setup", and
eventually towards dropping the hooks entirely.  There is no dependency
on the workqueue being created before hardware setup, the workqueue is
used only when destroying VMs, i.e. only needs to be created before
/dev/kvm is exposed to userspace.

Move the destruction of the workqueue before the arch hooks to maintain
symmetry, and so that arch code can move away from the hooks without
having to worry about ordering changes.

Reword the comment about kvm_irqfd_init() needing to come after
kvm_arch_init() to call out that kvm_arch_init() must come before common
KVM does _anything_, as x86 very subtly relies on that behavior to deal
with multiple calls to kvm_init(), e.g. if userspace attempts to load
kvm_amd.ko and kvm_intel.ko.  Tag the code with a FIXME, as x86's subtle
requirement is gross, and invoking an arch callback as the very first
action in a helper that is called only from arch code is silly.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index b60abb03606b..43e2e4f38151 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -5852,24 +5852,19 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
 	int r;
 	int cpu;
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: Get rid of kvm_arch_init(), vendor code should call arch code
+	 * directly.  Note, kvm_arch_init() _must_ be called before anything
+	 * else as x86 relies on checks buried in kvm_arch_init() to guard
+	 * against multiple calls to kvm_init().
+	 */
 	r = kvm_arch_init(opaque);
 	if (r)
-		goto out_fail;
-
-	/*
-	 * kvm_arch_init makes sure there's at most one caller
-	 * for architectures that support multiple implementations,
-	 * like intel and amd on x86.
-	 * kvm_arch_init must be called before kvm_irqfd_init to avoid creating
-	 * conflicts in case kvm is already setup for another implementation.
-	 */
-	r = kvm_irqfd_init();
-	if (r)
-		goto out_irqfd;
+		return r;
 
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_hardware_enabled, GFP_KERNEL)) {
 		r = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_free_0;
+		goto err_hw_enabled;
 	}
 
 	r = kvm_arch_hardware_setup(opaque);
@@ -5913,9 +5908,13 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
 		}
 	}
 
+	r = kvm_irqfd_init();
+	if (r)
+		goto err_irqfd;
+
 	r = kvm_async_pf_init();
 	if (r)
-		goto out_free_4;
+		goto err_async_pf;
 
 	kvm_chardev_ops.owner = module;
 
@@ -5946,6 +5945,9 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
 	kvm_vfio_ops_exit();
 err_vfio:
 	kvm_async_pf_deinit();
+err_async_pf:
+	kvm_irqfd_exit();
+err_irqfd:
 out_free_4:
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
 		free_cpumask_var(per_cpu(cpu_kick_mask, cpu));
@@ -5957,11 +5959,8 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
 	kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup();
 out_free_1:
 	free_cpumask_var(cpus_hardware_enabled);
-out_free_0:
-	kvm_irqfd_exit();
-out_irqfd:
+err_hw_enabled:
 	kvm_arch_exit();
-out_fail:
 	return r;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init);
@@ -5986,9 +5985,9 @@ void kvm_exit(void)
 	unregister_reboot_notifier(&kvm_reboot_notifier);
 	cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_KVM_STARTING);
 	on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
+	kvm_irqfd_exit();
 	kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup();
 	kvm_arch_exit();
-	kvm_irqfd_exit();
 	free_cpumask_var(cpus_hardware_enabled);
 	kvm_vfio_ops_exit();
 }
-- 
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog