Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <bd008582-1509-69f3-1812-2b9caa390c05@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:46:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A few cleanup and bugfix patches for blk-iocost
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>, tj@kernel.org,
        josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20221018121932.10792-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
 <93f9093b-abec-db7e-a945-263cd9355c08@huaweicloud.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <93f9093b-abec-db7e-a945-263cd9355c08@huaweicloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/30/22 6:45?PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> 
> Hi jens,
> on 10/18/2022 8:19 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> This series contain a few patch to correct comment, correct trace of
>> vtime_rate and so on. More detail can be found in the respective
>> changelogs.
>>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>  Thanks Tejun for review and comment!
>>  Add Acked-by tag from Tejun.
>>  Correct description in patch 3/5 and 4/5.
>>  Drop "blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse
>> == iocg->active"
>>  Drop "blk-iocost: Remove redundant initialization of struct ioc_gq"
>>  Drop "blk-iocost: Get ioc_now inside weight_updated"
>> ---
>>
>> Kemeng Shi (5):
>>   blk-iocost: Fix typo in comment
>>   blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params
>>   blk-iocost: Trace vtime_base_rate instead of vtime_rate
>>   blk-iocost: Remove vrate member in struct ioc_now
>>   blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init
>>
>>  block/blk-iocost.c            | 16 +++++++++-------
>>  include/trace/events/iocost.h |  4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> Could you apply this patchset?
> By the way, my apply for an cloud variant of email was just passed
> a few days ago. Is this mail still in spam?

This one wasn't, but I've seen the huaweicloud.com emails fail
the same origination checks in the past.

-- 
Jens Axboe