Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp290499rwb; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:09:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7ilS4lVKK9nLvq9laZjSg7WJ7B3ApHb5mecHy6CNilafJpiMY1UHeF7XgoWxZv/L8qVFR5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6153:b0:7ad:b51d:39d0 with SMTP id p19-20020a170906615300b007adb51d39d0mr53879844ejl.571.1669889386717; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:09:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669889386; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s3U+mZAcaIOtiPy3ESTTc8oASAGYZR13Z5jCWrmIfLvcLR/sqEZ4hiVU9W80fDyFx9 Crs/GSWWbB/vf20tUcIhlVwaXT05FkJbwAtKA1rK1Rty8/oMLlnqi27isKaogZUbJg+1 YIrWk7nUhloKV4bu8p/TfkHLxO0GUTEUeDtBB0aABRn1Ca5V7bY1fuK0R2GiAFfkg/az u8LscVLMj6JQAbngQzL3NYz3ucJQu2R96xuCPZ/z1zZZUKQT3e7ria2qbc32Jy2q1MeV 1uwHh9IPC/1258FKVMxiLZNP699Z+8znfk94zw3nsIM4LxA7JtwsxEsO1fMw0SMhafpN 59Ww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=0jFiCUY0VXNcy859wsO8NBTioywcuSZZtPBsENMWnSA=; b=ZIvhh+L8I7yLhNhXrKit7qbNGwF8pb0SXu2hFqdbP8oHX/l6HEZEewuteIuW8DE+MG xqwmsr3Njq8vZZtpXrvSciqgwULl++dEH2I7bPBc3uuLfwxuMDC3eeuvgGwoCf4E9j7b 3onwXtg6jVFHI98g52L27L2XxMeHc7uDIxoXoeYCFDDAFLaVogUcS6H6wnNuR8XYDxcu XOhiq0MTvkLguavkUnDT82lL/jCHCf4UEPVBggHaKPXyo1RlTDXNxpAomdruw3WoPEhU M5O56Agi9cry0hwRA1glcr1Dktow5pvR+8vNy4nbDjiUTuUgx/BF7nXHxs10PN7IoGit 88KQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ef+3veNn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hz1-20020a1709072ce100b0073306ff26besi3642379ejc.969.2022.12.01.02.09.26; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ef+3veNn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230267AbiLAJrQ (ORCPT + 83 others); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 04:47:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51098 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229806AbiLAJqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 04:46:52 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C2C89AED for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 01:45:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669887956; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0jFiCUY0VXNcy859wsO8NBTioywcuSZZtPBsENMWnSA=; b=Ef+3veNnnylOe0CXr1djbs6ZINvFCuH4CxtbVhiLjc6xNOPemiOh+/AyMghx30kZGJ8X6n R1qTe69f+eYbuFQQtdHiv7yPnT29NiF6/HjJMCOPiCBVwT3XTJl9nZByJoY3RWLQVcH7Mu a8ytjrHLRWWQo2Agf+e8bm3u2XTI/Sg= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-275-j4pjFFitMPSOAF7zlDRSZA-1; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 04:45:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: j4pjFFitMPSOAF7zlDRSZA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id f18-20020a7bcd12000000b003d077f0e3e5so470969wmj.7 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:45:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0jFiCUY0VXNcy859wsO8NBTioywcuSZZtPBsENMWnSA=; b=oYSYNF6mKNNOTtmTvrgEcM/DpYUfzLEygXfbJDngxRUgMRd5e6Cf8y/zp/8/hUG02L Y3HLjdNXec8D6ZDZgbvQUuMMglDY6Apf33DjKlxB7+Hj1FI/nUFYoEUNfIJFuhBc/NdL s9OAsXaRGx6dsOLU/f0v38XF9Wr2GPdwloxpbxFYZHb7m9Zkad7sxqcH6xq2q5Q7H632 9TFTtUTKoOkKXvTH94kzSqsBB/U7V63lPPY9Z1ru+5hfxlb8PDaG01FMXSjq5A79tnca 2eIGlPXDMIF+iEJ231hT3XwtxfQ36tZrwtFM0E/NCTEG2yMbe8/CodDM83Zd8Ie49amJ 66LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn8FwMiVwTyJgFvQvC2jLy3SDxElu2g9H3oDHmI7zvLv1cZZ3NZ wzOqRaD8ujVuiFsv+oASS/t3pcEWs1rAP00VJzA3wGIlIXaBm7c6yr0PwYBUMFUXUR/g9Y3qsKY KfXLJmQYG4F8qb/1KjE6ituDo X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5709:0:b0:241:d71c:5dde with SMTP id a9-20020a5d5709000000b00241d71c5ddemr32282800wrv.678.1669887954217; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:45:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5709:0:b0:241:d71c:5dde with SMTP id a9-20020a5d5709000000b00241d71c5ddemr32282770wrv.678.1669887953965; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgarzare-redhat (host-82-53-134-234.retail.telecomitalia.it. [82.53.134.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jb17-20020a05600c54f100b003d070272f25sm4660834wmb.8.2022.12.01.01.45.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:45:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:45:41 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Arseniy Krasnov Cc: "David S. Miller" , "edumazet@google.com" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "kys@microsoft.com" , "haiyangz@microsoft.com" , "wei.liu@kernel.org" , Dexuan Cui , Bryan Tan , Vishnu Dasa , Krasnov Arseniy , Bobby Eshleman , Bobby Eshleman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" , kernel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] test/vsock: add big message test Message-ID: <20221201094541.gj7zthelbeqhsp63@sgarzare-redhat> References: <9d96f6c6-1d4f-8197-b3bc-8957124c8933@sberdevices.ru> <2634ad7f-b462-5c69-8aa1-2f200a6beb20@sberdevices.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2634ad7f-b462-5c69-8aa1-2f200a6beb20@sberdevices.ru> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:13:06PM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >This adds test for sending message, bigger than peer's buffer size. >For SOCK_SEQPACKET socket it must fail, as this type of socket has >message size limit. > >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov >--- > tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >index 12ef0cca6f93..a8e43424fb32 100644 >--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >@@ -569,6 +569,70 @@ static void test_seqpacket_timeout_server(const struct test_opts *opts) > close(fd); > } > >+static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client(const struct test_opts *opts) >+{ >+ unsigned long sock_buf_size; >+ ssize_t send_size; >+ socklen_t len; >+ void *data; >+ int fd; >+ >+ len = sizeof(sock_buf_size); >+ >+ fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234); >+ if (fd < 0) { >+ perror("connect"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ >+ if (getsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE, >+ &sock_buf_size, &len)) { >+ perror("getsockopt"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ >+ sock_buf_size++; >+ >+ data = malloc(sock_buf_size); >+ if (!data) { >+ perror("malloc"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ >+ send_size = send(fd, data, sock_buf_size, 0); >+ if (send_size != -1) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "expected 'send(2)' failure, got %zi\n", >+ send_size); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ >+ if (errno != EMSGSIZE) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "expected EMSGSIZE in 'errno', got %i\n", >+ errno); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } We should make sure that this is true for all transports, but since now only virtio-vsock supports it, we should be okay. >+ >+ control_writeln("CLISENT"); >+ >+ free(data); >+ close(fd); >+} >+ >+static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_server(const struct test_opts *opts) >+{ >+ int fd; >+ >+ fd = vsock_seqpacket_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL); >+ if (fd < 0) { >+ perror("accept"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ >+ control_expectln("CLISENT"); >+ >+ close(fd); >+} >+ > #define BUF_PATTERN_1 'a' > #define BUF_PATTERN_2 'b' > >@@ -851,6 +915,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = { > .run_client = test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_client, > .run_server = test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_server, > }, >+ { >+ .name = "SOCK_SEQPACKET big message", >+ .run_client = test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client, >+ .run_server = test_seqpacket_bigmsg_server, >+ }, > {}, > }; > >-- >2.25.1 LGTM! Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella