Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, conor@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
        guoren@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] RISC-V: resort all extensions in consistent orders
Date:   Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:48:28 +0100
Message-ID: <113066935.nniJfEyVGO@diego>
In-Reply-To: <20221130234125.2722364-3-conor@kernel.org>
References: <20221130234125.2722364-1-conor@kernel.org> <20221130234125.2722364-3-conor@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2022, 00:41:25 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Ordering between each and every list of extensions is wildly
> inconsistent. Per discussion on the lists pick the following policy:
> 
> - The array defining order in /proc/cpuinfo follows a narrow
>   interpretation of the ISA specifications, described in a comment
>   immediately presiding it.
> 
> - All other lists of extensions are sorted alphabetically.
> 
> This will hopefully allow for easier review & future additions, and
> reduce conflicts between patchsets as the number of extensions grows.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221129144742.2935581-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com/
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>